Santa Fe New Mexican

Abortion pills may face new limits

Pharmaceut­ical industry says second-guessing FDA could disrupt approvals, research

- By Ann E. Marimow and Caroline Kitchener

Less than two years after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the issue of reproducti­ve rights is returning to the high court Tuesday as the justices consider whether to limit access to a medication used in more than 60% of U.S. abortions.

The Biden administra­tion and the manufactur­er of mifepristo­ne are seeking to reverse a lower-court ruling that would make it more difficult to obtain the medication, first approved nearly 25 years ago and shown in multiple studies to be overwhelmi­ngly safe.

The conservati­ve U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit said the Food and Drug Administra­tion failed to follow proper procedures and thoroughly explain its reasoning when it began loosening regulation­s. The changes made in 2016 and again in 2021 allowed mifepristo­ne to be taken up to 10 weeks into pregnancy, instead of seven weeks, prescribed by a medical profession­al other than a doctor, and mailed directly to patients without an in-person medical consultati­on.

The pharmaceut­ical industry has warned second-guessing the FDA’s determinat­ions in this case will more broadly disrupt the nation’s drugapprov­al process and stymie private investment in research. A decision should come by this summer.

The case could make it harder to get medication abortions even in states where abortion is legal.

Allowing medication abortions to proceed without an ultrasound or in-person medical visit has increased access, particular­ly for women in rural areas and others who struggle to go to a clinic in person by allowing them to complete the process from home.

The Supreme Court could also further impede abortion access for those living in one of the more than a dozen states with strict abortion bans in place.

A few telemedici­ne clinics have started allowing U.S.-based doctors to prescribe and mail pills into restricted states, relying on new “shield laws” passed in several blue states to protect them from prosecutio­n. The largest of those clinics, Aid Access, now mails approximat­ely 6,000 doses of medication abortion into antiaborti­on states every month, according to founder Rebecca Gomperts.

A narrowed time window for accessing abortion pills would have major implicatio­ns nationwide. In 2021, 56% of all abortions occurred beyond seven weeks of pregnancy.

Just 20% occurred after 10 weeks, the FDA’s current mifepristo­ne limit.

For the FDA and the pharmaceut­ical industry, the legal battle over mifepristo­ne casts a shadow over all drugs, medical devices and diagnostic­s the agency approves.

If the 5th Circuit’s decision is upheld, industry and former government officials say, it would undercut the FDA’s stature as the global gold standard of regulating medicine — as well as the ability of drugmakers to raise money from investors.

That, in turn, could deprive patients of innovative therapies.

Pharmaceut­ical companies denied approval for a drug could use the courts to reverse the agency’s scientific judgments — or challenge the approval of a competitor’s drug, former FDA commission­ers said in a brief to the high court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States