Sentinel & Enterprise

Thank you, Gov. Baker! Sununu sees windfall from TCI policy

- By Michael Graham Michael Graham is political editor at InsideSour­ces. You can reach him at michael@inside sources.com.

One year ago, when Gov. Chris Sununu announced New Hampshire wouldn’t participat­e in a regional cap-and-tax carbon plan, he was roundly criticized by green activists who said he was making the Granite State the odd man out in the Northeast.

“The governor’s response is premature and disappoint­ing,” said Roger Stephenson, regional advocacy director for the Union of Concerned Scientists who lives in Stratham, N.H.

On Tuesday came news that the Transporta­tion and Climate Initiative ( TCI) originally projected to reach from North Carolina to Maine would include just three states and Washington, D.C. And now, Sununu believes, New Hampshire is sitting pretty. In particular, because one of the three is neighborin­g Massachuse­tts.

TCI is a proposal to use a cap-and-trade pricing approach to drive down greenhouse gas emissions and generate revenues for transporta­tion infrastruc­ture among New England and Mid-Atlantic states. The initiative is facilitate­d by the Georgetown Climate Center, which worked closely with the Obama administra­tion to design and implement climate change policies.

A report released last December estimated a 17 cent-per-gallon boost to reach TCI’s goal of a 25% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). However, a more recent study by the Beacon Hill Institute for Public Policy Research, and commission­ed by the Massachuse­tts Fiscal Alliance, projected a price increase of up to 26 cents per gallon. For diesel fuel, prices could jump as high as 52 cents per gallon.

As a result, Bay Staters could end up paying nearly $800 more a year in gasoline alone. Which is good news for New Hampshire retailers.

Asked by NHJournal if he believed New Hampshire would benefit economical­ly from Gov. Charlie Baker’s decision to join the TCI Sununu said: “Yeah! I don’t see how we wouldn’t.”

“There’s no doubt that if you start adding a 20 or 25 cent extra gas tax, especially around the border of towns of Massachuse­tts — Haverhill, Methuen, Lawrence — there’s no doubt folks are going to come across the border to get gas and buy their groceries and whatever else they’re going to be purchasing,” Sununu said.

It’s not the first time Massachuse­tts has made New Hampshire’s economic life a little easier. Over the past two years, the Bay State has banned flavored vape products and menthol cigarettes. The result has been a boon in sales — and state revenue — along the border.

The TCI project began more than two years ago with 12 states, but on Monday just three — Massachuse­tts, Rhode Island and Connecticu­t, plus

D.C. — actually signed on the dotted line. Baker was the only Republican governor to put his state in the program.

Sununu objects to the TCI on both policy and pragmatic grounds. He’s long complained that the estimated $7 billion the scheme would generate for mass transit and infrastruc­ture would come disproport­ionately from rural and exurban drivers.

“How do I ask a taxpayer in Franklin to get another 20 cents a gallon on their gas tax, so they can subsidize the debt service on the Boston MBTA system? That doesn’t make any sense to anybody,” Sununu said Tuesday.

He also notes TCI’s revenue math is based on the preCOVID economy, which no longer matches the economic facts on the ground.

“You have to add on the aspect that more people are remote working, right?

So all of the financial estimates of how much money that gas tax was going to bring in are likely going to fall short because more people are working remotely. So they’re ( TCI advocates) are going to come back and raise the tax yet again,” Sununu said.

“This is one of those situations that could really snowball out of control in a very bad way economical­ly.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States