Sentinel & Enterprise

If Roe falls, some fear the repercussi­ons

- By Lindsay Whitehurst and Lindsey Tanner

If the Supreme Court follows through on overturnin­g Roe v. Wade, abortion likely will be banned or greatly restricted in about half the U.S. states. But experts and advocates fear repercussi­ons could reach even further, affecting care for women who miscarry, couples seeking fertility treatments and access to some forms of contracept­ion

any conservati­ves insist they are only interested in curtailing abortion, and legislatio­n passed so far often has exceptions for other reproducti­ve care. But rumblings from some in the GOP have experts concerned, and laws banning abortion could also have unintended side effects.

“The rhetoric has been really increasing over the last several years,” said Mara Gandal-powers, the director of birth control access at the National Women’s Law Center. “There’s definitely a domino effect which I think people are really starting to wake up to and see this is how far it could go.”

If Roe is overturned, as suggested by a leaked draft opinion, states will set their own abortion laws, and conservati­ve lawmakers are already passing a steady stream of deeply restrictiv­e regulation­s. Oklahoma lawmakers, for example, passed legislatio­n Thursday banning abortion at conception, the strictest in the nation.

Although that bill has some exceptions, it signals a direction that is deeply worrisome for many doctors.

“I truly think the people writing these laws either have no concept of the broad implicatio­ns or do not care about how this impacts so many aspects of women’s health care,” said

Dr. Kristyn Brandi, a New Jersey OB- GYN who provides abortion care.

“In medicine, you are not considered pregnant until this fertilized egg is implanted into the uterus — which happens after fertilizat­ion,” Brandi said. She said it is unclear whether doctors performing infertilit­y treatments would be in violation of the law if they dispose of extra fertilized eggs. The Oklahoma measure “is not based in science and is incredibly confusing and frustratin­g for medical profession­als trying to provide evidence based care.

The Roe decision was based on a constituti­onal right to privacy — and the decision leaned on another landmark case eight years earlier that gave married couples the right to birth control, Griswold v. Connecticu­t.

Reliable birth control is now a feature of life for millions of Americans, but in March U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee recorded a video message naming the Griswold decision as “constituti­onally unsound.” She’s not proposing restrictio­ns on birth control but hasn’t commented further to clarify what she meant.

Other conservati­ves have conflated emergency contracept­ion, often known as the morning-after pill, with abortion. In Idaho, for example, it was prohibited at school-based health clinics last year under a law banning public funding for “abortion related services.”

Along with long-acting birth control devices called IUDS, emergency contracept­ion has been been attacked by abortion foes who believe life begins when an egg is fertilized.

But those pills have no effect once a pregnancy is establishe­d, after implantati­on in the womb, Brandi said.

“You can take Plan B all you want when you’re pregnant. It will not do anything to your pregnancy,” she said.

Emergency contracept­ive pills like Plan B and IUDS may also prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the womb, but experts say the science on that isn’t clear. It is believed they mostly work by blocking fertilizat­ion.

Political attempts to block access to intrauteri­ne devices and other birth control “would be consistent with the pattern that we’re seeing right now,” said Dr. Jennifer Kerns, an associate professor at the University of California, San Francisco who also provides abortion care. “Many of us are very concerned that that’s kind of the next up on the chopping block.”

In Missouri last year, for example, there was a failed effort to prevent IUDS and emergency contracept­ion from being paid for by Medicaid. But in Tennessee, which just passed harsh penalties for providing abortion medication, Republican Senate Speaker Randy Mcnally pushed back on any suggestion that contracept­ion could be in the crosshairs.

“Contracept­ion and abortion are not the same thing. One is a responsibl­e way to prevent pregnancy. The other ends a human life. It is a flagrant attempt to change the conversati­on and it won’t work,” spokesman Adam Kleinheide­r said in a statement.

The governor of Mississipp­i, one of 13 states that will immediatel­y ban abortion if Roe is overturned, wouldn’t say whether he’d sign a hypothetic­al birthcontr­ol ban when asked on “Meet the Press.” Gov. Tate Reeves later clarified on Twitter: “I’m not interested in banning contracept­ives.”

But doctors also worry other forms of reproducti­ve care, like treating ectopic pregnancie­s, could be targeted. These occur when a fertilized egg implants outside the uterus, often in a fallopian tube. They are often life-threatenin­g medical emergencie­s because the fragile tube can rupture, causing massive internal bleeding.

In 2019, an Ohio Republican proposed a measure that would have compelled doctors to try transplant­ing ectopic pregnancie­s into the uterus or allowing insurers to cover the hypothetic­al procedure, which is considered medically impossible.

After Texas banned abortion after six weeks, Kerns said colleagues there have told of patients with ectopic pregnancie­s being transferre­d out of state for treatment, putting their health at risk.

Physicians may even become hesitant to treat miscarriag­e, said Brandi, the New Jersey OB- GYN.

Women often miscarry alone, early in pregnancy, with no need for medical assistance. For others, it involves heavy prolonged bleeding and treatment is exactly the same as abortion — the same pills or procedure. Doctors in states that outlaw abortion would fear repercussi­ons for treating miscarriag­es, Brandi said. Most end safely but infection is a risk, she said.

Plus, Brandi added, it can take eight weeks for someone “once they’ve diagnosed with a miscarriag­e to actually pass the pregnancy” without interventi­on. That can be traumatic, particular­ly for women who wanted to be pregnant.

Roxanne Kelly, a mental health specialist in Arkansas, has a family history of miscarriag­es and ectopic pregnancie­s. Knowing she’s at high risk, she shudders hearing politician­s equate treatment for both with abortion.

“Instead of receiving medical care, … I would be treated potentiall­y as a murderer,” Kelly said. She shared her fears with her husband recently, and he “immediatel­y offered to get a vasectomy,” saying “it’s reversible and keeps you safe,” Kelly said.

Meanwhile, some states still have abortion bans on the books that date back to the 1800s. If Roe is overturned, those bans with vague definition­s of abortion could snap back into effect.

“Some states don’t say what abortion is; they just say abortion is a crime,” said Mary Ziegler, a law professor at University of California, Davis. “There’s a history of defining abortion more broadly to include steps in IVF or some forms of contracept­ion.”

The Supreme Court isn’t expected to issue its final ruling until June or July.

 ?? AP FILE ?? Margot Riphagen of New Orleans, wears a birth control pill costume as she protests in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., in 2014. This year, a leaked draft opinion indicating U.S. Supreme Court justices are poised to overturn the decision that legalized abortion nationwide is raising fears that restrictio­ns on contracept­ion could follow.
AP FILE Margot Riphagen of New Orleans, wears a birth control pill costume as she protests in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., in 2014. This year, a leaked draft opinion indicating U.S. Supreme Court justices are poised to overturn the decision that legalized abortion nationwide is raising fears that restrictio­ns on contracept­ion could follow.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States