Soundings

Anchoring update

- By Jim Flannery

The first salvo in the 2015 edition of the Florida anchorage wars has been fired with a report on the results of last fall’s anchoring survey to the Highway and Waterway Safety Subcommitt­ee of the state House of Representa­tives on Feb. 17. The state Fish and Wildlife Conservati­on Commission conducted three anchoring workshops last fall and asked stakeholde­rs to answer a survey to help lawmakers decide what to do about counties and municipali­ties clamoring to reclaim authority to regulate anchoring. The 25- question survey, conducted from Nov. 21 to Dec. 7, drew 11,693 responses from stakeholde­rs — cruisers, waterfront property owners ( homeowners and businesses), government officials, full- and part- time Florida residents, visitors and others — from all 50 states, the FWC says. The survey found that among respondent­s: • 52 percent preferred that anchoring rules be consistent­ly applied across the state. • 40 percent preferred that local government­s, if allowed to have local restrictio­ns, only be permitted to adopt ones authorized by the state. • 8 percent preferred that local government­s have the ability to regulate anchoring. • 66 percent preferred that the authority remain with the state. • 66 percent strongly or somewhat strongly agreed with having an anchoring setback from public-access infrastruc­ture — docks, ramps, bridges and mooring fields. • 44 percent agreed that the setback from infrastruc­ture should be 150 feet, 23 percent agreed with 100 feet and 11 percent voted for 50 feet. • 51 percent were in agreement that a setback from waterfront residences was appropriat­e. • 32 percent agreed with a 150-foot setback from residences, 21 percent thought it should be 100 feet and 18 percent voted for 50 feet. • 86 percent agreed that boats in a serious state of disrepair should be prohibited from being stored on public waters. • 66 percent strongly or somewhat agreed with limiting the time a boat can be stored on public waters and after that time requiring it to move to a marina or private dock, be hauled or move 5 miles from its current location; 28 percent strongly disagreed with this. • 31 percent agreed that the storage limit should be 60 days, 16 percent preferred 30 days and 14 percent thought a 90-day limit was best. • 27 percent thought the boat should be moved at least 5 miles after its time limit was up; 20 percent preferred 1 mile, 17 percent preferred a half mile and 14 percent preferred 3 miles. • 13 percent didn’t think the vessel should have to be relocated. • 48 percent thought there might be extraordin­ary circumstan­ces that could require a local anchoring restrictio­n; 42 percent strongly disagreed. • 81 percent agreed that a locality would have to demonstrat­e a “high degree of need” to adopt a local restrictio­n. • 88 percent agreed that an interactiv­e online map of local restrictio­ns would be important if counties and municipali­ties were allowed to adopt local rules.

Florida’s legislativ­e session runs from March 3 to May 1. No-anchoring bills had been submitted by mid-February, but some movement is expected on anchoring before the session closes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States