South Florida Sun-Sentinel Palm Beach (Sunday)

Judge shields some Texas abortion clinics from suits

- Associated Press

AUSTIN, Texas — A judge has temporaril­y shielded some Texas abortion clinics from being sued by the state’s largest anti-abortion group under a new law banning most abortions.

The temporary restrainin­g order issued Friday by District Judge Maya Guerra Gamble in Austin in response to the Planned Parenthood request does not interfere with the enforcemen­t of the law. However, it shields Planned Parenthood’s clinics, specifical­ly, from whistleblo­wer lawsuits by the nonprofit group Texas Right to Life, its legislativ­e director and people working in concert with the group.

A hearing on a preliminar­y injunction request is scheduled for Sept. 13. The temporary restrainin­g order only shields Planned Parenthood clinics from Texas Right to Life lawsuits and doesn’t prevent Texas Right to Life from suing non-Planned Parenthood abortion clinics in Texas. It also doesn’t prevent people who aren’t affiliated with the Texas Right to Life from suing Planned Parenthood.

The law, which took effect Wednesday, prohibits abortions once medical profession­als can detect cardiac activity, which is usually around the sixth week of pregnancy and before some women realize they’re pregnant. The law also leaves enforcemen­t to private citizens through lawsuits instead of to prosecutor­s through criminal charges.

Planned Parenthood said in a statement Friday that the law was “already decimating abortion access in the state, as providers are forced to turn people away” once medical profession­als can detect cardiac activity. It said historical­ly, 85% to 90% of women who have gotten abortions in Texas were at least six weeks into their pregnancie­s.

In its petition filed late Thursday, Planned Parenthood said that even if it prevails in every case filed against the group, the lawsuits would still accomplish the law’s goal to “harass abortion providers and others critical to a patient’s support network.” The group also said fighting the lawsuits could bankrupt those who are sued, since under the law they can’t recover attorney fees and costs if they win.

Texas Right to Life Vice President Elizabeth Graham said in a statement that her group expects the lawsuit to be dismissed and that, “until then, we will continue our diligent efforts to ensure the abortion industry fully follows” the new law.

The law, which is the nation’s most far-reaching curb on abortions since they were legalized a half-century ago, took effect Wednesday. The Supreme Court then allowed it to remain in force by voting 5-4 to deny an emergency appeal from abortion providers.

Texas Right to Life has created a website to receive public tips about violations, though the site was down Saturday morning after its host, Go Daddy, said it violated the company’s terms of service, including a provision against collecting identifyin­g informatio­n about someone without their consent. A spokeswoma­n for Texas Right to Life said Friday that the group was moving its site to another provider and expected it to be running again within two days.

The site, which has inspired activists on social media to encourage people to flood it with misinforma­tion, had not as of Friday received any credible tips about alleged violations, said Texas Right to Life’s senior legislativ­e associate, Rebecca Parma.

She said abortion providers appeared to be “complying with the law, and that’s the whole point of the law in

 ??  ?? Demonstrat­ors protest Wednesday in Austin against the new law creating an almost complete ban on abortions in Texas.
Demonstrat­ors protest Wednesday in Austin against the new law creating an almost complete ban on abortions in Texas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States