South Florida Sun-Sentinel Palm Beach (Sunday)

Yet another scheme to make it harder to vote

-

Here we go again. Like the dogwoods that bloom every spring in Tallahasse­e, the Legislatur­e’s annual obsession with making it harder to vote has returned — just as we all knew it would.

It isn’t pretty. It isn’t necessary. And it isn’t right.

The Senate sprang a 98-page elections bill on the public with scant 24 hours notice before a recent committee hearing. Naturally, concerned citizens who traveled to Tallahasse­e from throughout the state had one minute to testify. As some raced through prepared remarks, they sounded like the old Federal Express commercial.

You can’t blame them. There’s a lot not to like in this bill. It has more than two dozen specific changes to an elections code that also underwent major changes in 2021 and 2022 — even after trouble-free elections. A year ago, Gov. Ron DeSantis got his elections police force. The year before, the Legislatur­e restricted the use of ballot drop boxes.

This time, the targets are first-time voters such as college students, and groups that register new voters.

The Senate bill (SB 7050) would:

Increase fines on third-party groups that register new voters, and give them less time (10 days, not the current 14) to return voter registrati­on forms. These groups should return forms promptly. But imposing steep fines on groups with shoestring budgets is an intimidati­on tactic to make the groups reconsider whether it’s really worth it to sign up voters.

Require third-party voter registrati­on groups, often staffed by volunteers, to register with the state every election cycle, not once as they do now. It’s an added bureaucrat­ic burden imposed by Republican­s who pretend to want less government intrusion in people’s lives.

Require first-time voters to vote in person the first time if they don’t have a state-issued driver’s license or state ID. Let’s say a student moves to Orlando from New Jersey. She enrolls at the University of Central Florida, lives on campus, and doesn’t own a car. How does she vote?

Allow political committees to file reports less often at a time when most legislator­s control such committees, laden with special interest money. This change shows utter contempt for transparen­cy. PCs are loosely regulated soft-money machines that are thinly disguised expense accounts for some politician­s.

On the other hand, parts of the bill make sense. Front-line election workers who verify signatures on vote-by-mail ballots would have to undergo formal signature training, and it would be a third-degree felony to harass election workers “with the intent to impede or interfere” with their civic duty.

But most of the bill is a step backward, and the proof is easy to find: Most changes were not requested by county supervisor­s who actually run elections in Florida.

For the first time, the state would require a disclaimer on every voter informatio­n card that says: “This card is for informatio­n purposes only. This card is proof of registrati­on but is not legal verificati­on of the eligibilit­y to vote. It is the responsibi­lity of a voter to keep his or her eligibilit­y status current.”

That looks suspicious­ly like an after-thefact attempt to undercut one of the defenses by convicted felons accused by the state of voter fraud for voting when they unknowingl­y may have been ineligible. Some of those defendants have cited the fact that they were issued voter ID cards by their county elections office. If Florida had a fully functionin­g voter registrati­on system, the state would easily find cases of ineligible voters on the rolls.

Sticking legalese on voter ID cards is an admission by the state that it’s unwilling or incapable of creating a centralize­d voter system to determine voter eligibilit­y, a point made by the Florida Rights Restoratio­n Coalition, which led a statewide drive to restore voting rights to most felons.

“If Florida desires to become the ‘gold standard’ of election integrity, it must start with fixing what’s broken, not painting over it with more legislatio­n,” the coalition said. “We believe creating a centralize­d voter registrati­on system is the answer, not creating confusing laws or spending tax dollars to investigat­e and prosecute Florida citizens from all walks of life.”

Senate Ethics & Elections Committee Chairman Danny Burgess, R-Zephyrhill­s, called the bill “very technical and mechanical.” If only it were that easy.

This legislatio­n appears calculated to discourage volunteers from registerin­g new voters, and it is no coincidenc­e that this proposal surfaces after Florida ended its membership in ERIC, the Electronic Registrati­on Informatio­n Center, a multistate data-sharing effort to make the voter rolls more accurate and reduce duplicate voter registrati­ons.

One of the conditions of ERIC membership was for states to undertake a statewide mailing to all adult citizens who have not registered to vote. By their recent actions, including this bill, Republican­s demonstrat­e that they want Republican­s to vote. They don’t want everybody to vote.

Next week is Week 7 of the nine-week session, and none of these changes have yet been heard in the House of Representa­tives. What’s the rush here?

Year after year, it’s the same old story. This is no way to tinker with the people’s access to democracy.

The Sun Sentinel Editorial Board consists of Editorial Page Editor Steve Bousquet, Deputy Editorial Page Editor Dan Sweeney, and Editor-in-Chief Julie Anderson. Editorials are the opinion of the Board and written by one of its members or a designee. To contact us, email at letters@sun-sentinel.com.

 ?? SERVICE OF FLORIDA
NEWS ?? Republican Sen. Danny Burgess of Zephyrhill­s calls a 98-page elections bill “very technical and mechanical.”It is also unnecessar­y.
SERVICE OF FLORIDA NEWS Republican Sen. Danny Burgess of Zephyrhill­s calls a 98-page elections bill “very technical and mechanical.”It is also unnecessar­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States