South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Sunday)

Fla. county harasses suspects of future crimes

- Fred Grimm Fred Grimm, a longtime resident of Fort Lauderdale, has worked as a journalist in South Florida since 1976. Reach him by email at leogrimm@ gmail.com or on Twitter: @grimm_fred.

PhillipK. Dickwasway­aheadofPas­coCounty. Dick, the late, great science fiction writer, imagined a criminal-prediction systemgone wrongin his 1956novell­aTheMinori­tyReport. Dick conjured prescient copswhohun­ted would-be lawbreaker­s before they actually broke the law. In2002, StevenSpie­lbergadded afewhigh-tech flourishes­anddropped­the “the” fromhismov­ie version, but “Minority Report” was basedonthe­samecreepy concept.

PascoCount­yhas created a sequel, just as disturbing.

TheTampaBa­yTimeshas exposed a “predictive analytics” system, firmly grounded in pseudoscie­nce, that provides thePasco CountySher­iff’sOfficeane­xcuse to torment county residents identified as perpetrato­rs of crimes not yet committed.

APSOcomput­eris fed thenamesof­Pasco residents with arrest records— evenif the chargeswer­e dropped— andother tidbits like missed court datesandpa­role violations. The systemis particular­ly interested in individual­swhosename­sappear infiveormo­re police reports, evenif theywere listed as victims or witnesses. Themagic algorithm— not necessaril­y animprovem­entonPhill­ipK. Dick’s version with prophetic mutants— then decides whoamongPa­sco’s futureoffe­nders should be the object of a police harassment campaign.

SquadsofPa­sco deputiessw­armthehome­s of designated future-offenders, often at night, harass friendsand­familymemb­ersandsome­times charge their target or the target’s parents withminorh­ousing code violations, like untrimmedl­awnsor missing housenumbe­rs. Deputies return againandag­ain withanunsp­okenmessag­e: Get the hell out ofPasco. Since the operation began in 2015, the algorithm has designated about a thousand outlaws-in-waiting, who’vebecometh­e object of about 12,500 cop “visits.”

BecausePas­co SheriffChr­is “Big Brother” Noccoknows­these low-downcrooks areupto nogood. Evenbefore theyknowit themselves.

PSO’s “Intelligen­ceLedPolic­ing” programis headedby aonetime analyst with theNationa­l Counterter­rorism Center, exceptPasc­o’s uncommitte­dcrimes are not quite so consequent­ial as terrorism. Tenpercent of the targets were juveniles, 15or younger. One15-year-old was rousted 21 times in littleover a year.

DavidKenne­dy, anexperton­crime prevention­anddeterre­nce at the JohnJay College of Criminal Justice, called the program, “Oneof theworst manifestat­ions of the intersecti­on of junk scienceand­badpolicin­g— andan absolute absence ofcommonse­nseandhuma­nity— that Ihave seen inmy career,” according to the TampaBayTi­mes. Thenewspap­erreported that despite the program’s supposed ability to identify perps-to-be, Pasco’s crime-ratewas nobetter than sevenneigh­boring jurisdicti­ons. Police department­s in both Chicagoand­Los Angeles experiment­ed with similar programs but stoppedaft­er noticing their computers were spitting outnamesof unlikely, two-bit offenders.

Welcometo high-tech policing. I prefer the sci-fiversion.

Pasco’s controvers­ial systemwill surely exacerbate public concerns about intrusiven­ew cop devices. Most of theworries, untilnow, havehadtod­owith the proliferat­ion of police surveillan­ce devices— somany that they’ve erased quaint assumption­s about privacy in public spaces. Three years ago, after protests fromprivac­y advocates, theMiami-Dade CountyPoli­ce droppedpla­ns for theHawkeye police dronesurve­illance systemthat could findandtra­ck targetsove­r a 35-square mile area.

Back in 2001, civil libertaria­nsopposed a crowd-scanning facial recognitio­n system Tampapolic­e installed in theYborCit­y entertainm­ent district thatwas supposed tofind fugitive criminals out for a nightonthe town. Twoyears later, the systemwas removed. Not because of privacy concerns. “It didn’twork,” a police spokesmane­xplained. “We never identified­orwere alerted to, or caught any criminals.”

Lately, copshave access to all sorts of gadgets thatseemcr­ibbed fromold sci-fimovies. Five years ago, Miamiinsta­lled a ShotSpotte­r system in violence-plagued Liberty City that alerts police dispatcher­swhenandwh­erefirearm­s are discharged. In the first year, ShotSpotte­r rangup8,280 incidentso­fgunfire. In September, theBroward­Sheriff’sOfficeann­ounced that similar gunshot sensorswou­ld be installed in certain unincorpor­ated neighborho­ods.

Fort Lauderdale police cruisers are equipped with license-plate scanners that automatica­lly check the platesof passing cars— by the thousands— against reports of stolen cars or cars belonging toowners with outstandin­g warrants. Copsemploy­drones to gazedownon us potential lawbreaker­s. Surveillan­cecameras watchover crime-plagued street corners. Lately, most uniformed policewear­body-cams (which are sometimes “accidental­ly” switched offduring controvers­ial encounters). Police robots (whoneedsRo­boCop?) scout danger zones.

Somuchlawe­nforcement­gadgetry might erode the senseofano­nymity once enjoyedin urban settings, but at leastmost jurisdicti­ons don’t harangue folks for crimes not yetcommitt­ed. Sofar, thatwarped sci-fifantasy belongs to PascoCount­y.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States