Springfield News-Sun

Parties have taken wrong lessons from 2020 election

- Jonah Goldberg

You wouldn’t know it from how Republican­s and Democrats are talking, but the 2020 election was actually a success.

During a pandemic, we had a national election with record-breaking turnout. The presidenti­al candidate receiving the most votes in both the Electoral College and in the popular vote was rightly declared the winner and sworn in on schedule. There was no evidence of fraud that would have changed the results. The election was certified and tallied by Congress on schedule.

Yes, that “mostly on schedule” elides the fact that Donald Trump spent months trying to steal an election he lost, culminatin­g in a deadly insurrecti­onist mob swarming the Capitol.

But as terrible as that was, nearly everyone in a position of real responsibi­lity and accountabi­lity, from former Vice President Mike Pence down to officials in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan and Pennsylvan­ia, did what the law and the Constituti­on required.

And yet, to listen to backers of the Democrats’ H.R. 1, the “For the People Act,” there’s no time to waste to save democracy or prevent a Jan. 6 replay.

“The 2020 election has underscore­d the urgent need for transforma­tional democracy reform,” Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) says. “Across the nation, Americans experience­d unpreceden­ted suppressio­n.”

They did? It was the largest turnout in decades.

Indeed, voting was probably never easier than it was in 2020, and for good reason: There was a pandemic. This seems to have been lost on a lot of people. States changed their laws to make voting safer by making voting easier. We reduced long lines and got rid of crowded polling places in many places, not for the sake of convenienc­e but for safety.

Republican complaints about these measures were almost entirely cynical and selective, aimed mostly at the states the Trump campaign thought it had the best chance of flipping to steal the election. Some criticisms had legal and constituti­onal merit. For instance, changes to election laws in some states were supposed to be authorized by state legislatur­es. But the time to challenge those changes — none of which amounted to fraud anyway — was before the election, not after getting results you didn’t like.

That didn’t stop the Republican­s from trying to use the U.S. Supreme Court and then Congress itself on Jan. 6 to nullify the rights of states to hold elections as they see fit. Democrats were rightly appalled by this attempted power grab.

Now, the positions are reversed. The “For the People Act” would in effect federalize elections. It would allow endruns around state voter ID requiremen­ts; allow ballot harvesting (so long as the harvesters don’t get paid based on the number of ballots returned); require states to permit curbside voting, early voting, sameday registrati­on, voting in the wrong precinct; and so on. It also heavily regulates political activity and speech to the point where even the ACLU has criticized it.

How any of this would have prevented Trump from trying to steal the election is a mystery.

Republican­s claim to be aghast at this assault on states’ rights — a position that would have a bit more credibilit­y if many of them hadn’t just supported nullifying the votes of just enough states to hand the election to Trump.

By all means, let’s have some reasonable reform efforts. But with Trump out of the White House and the pandemic almost over, there’s time to do it right.

Jonah Goldberg is editor-inchief of The Dispatch.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States