Springfield News-Sun

Facebook clamps down in effort to prevent leaks

- Ryan Mac

Facebook told employees this week it was making some of its internal online discussion groups private, in an effort to minimize leaks.

Many Facebook employees join online discussion groups on Workplace, an internal message board that workers use to communicat­e and collaborat­e with one another.

In the announceme­nt, the company said it was making some groups focused on platform safety and protecting elections, an area known broadly as “integrity,” private instead of public within the company, limiting who can view and participat­e in the discussion threads.

The move follows the disclosure by Frances Haugen, a former employee, of thousands of pages of internal documents to regulators, lawmakers and the news media. The documents showed Facebook was aware of some of the harms it was causing. Haugen, a former member of Facebook’s civic misinforma­tion team, has filed a whistle-blower complaint with the Securities and Exchange Commission and testified to a Senate subcommitt­ee this month.

“As everyone is likely aware, we’ve seen an increase in the number of Integrity-related leaks in recent months,” an engineerin­g director wrote in the announceme­nt.

“These leaks aren’t representa­tive of the nuances and complexiti­es involved in our work and are often taken out of context, leading to our work being mischaract­erized externally.”

Facebook had been known for an open culture that encouraged debate and transparen­cy, but it has become more insular as it has confronted leaks about issues such as toxic speech and misinforma­tion and grappled with employee unrest. In July, the communicat­ions team shuttered comments on an internal forum used for companywid­e announceme­nts, writing, “OUR ONE REQUEST: PLEASE DON’T LEAK.”

“Leaks make it harder for our teams to work together, can put employees working on sensitive subjects at risk externally and lead to complex topics being misreprese­nted and misunderst­ood,” Andy Stone, a Facebook spokesman, said in a statement. Stone also said Facebook had been planning the changes for months.

Facebook now plans to comb through some of the online discussion groups to remove individual­s whose work isn’t related to safety and security.

In internal comments, which were shared with The Times, some employees supported the move while others denounced the loss of transparen­cy and collaborat­ion. They called the change “counterpro­ductive” and “dishearten­ing,” with one person suggesting that it could lead to even more leaks from disgruntle­d employees.

“I think every single employee at the company should be thinking about and working on integrity as part of their day-to-day role, and we should work to foster a culture where that’s the expectatio­n,” one Facebook employee wrote. “Siloing off the people who are dedicated to integrity will harm both active efforts to collaborat­e and reduce the cultural expectatio­n that integrity is everyone’s responsibi­lity.”

 ?? THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Facebook is under scrutiny after Frances Haugen, a former product manager, testified to a Senate subcommitt­ee that the company was aware of some of the harm it was causing.
THE NEW YORK TIMES Facebook is under scrutiny after Frances Haugen, a former product manager, testified to a Senate subcommitt­ee that the company was aware of some of the harm it was causing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States