Springfield News-Sun

I left Fox News, Carlson’s ‘Patriot Purge’ final straw

- Jonah Goldberg Jonah Goldberg is editor-inchief of The Dispatch.

I quit Fox News after more than a decade as a contributo­r. So did my business partner and friend Steve Hayes.

We explained our reasons on the Dispatch, a media company we founded. But the decision was a long time in coming. Like Ernest Hemingway’s descriptio­n of bankruptcy, it came gradually and then suddenly.

The sudden part came thanks to Fox host Tucker Carlson’s streaming special “Patriot Purge.” It’s a perfect example of propaganda that weaves halftruths into a whole lie. It insinuates that the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol might have been a “false flag operation,” orchestrat­ed by the FBI or the Deep State. Worse, it suggests the Biden administra­tion is coming for the real patriots — i.e. Trump voters. “The domestic war on terror is here,” says one of the “experts” in “Patriot Purge.” “It’s coming after half of the country.”

This dangerous nonsense was the last straw for me (and Steve). It was an unhappy decision for us. We have many friends at the network, and there are many people, particular­ly on the news side, that do good, honest journalism.

People keep asking me, “Why’d it take you so long?” The short answer is we hoped — and had reason to believe — that Fox would get back on course, and we wanted to help get it there. If your view is that Fox News was always irredeemab­ly bad, that explanatio­n will fall flat. I can’t help you there. But for us, the release of “Patriot Purge” was proof that waiting for Fox to get back on track would be like waiting for Godot.

I also have a broader point to make. As a fairly prominent critic of Donald Trump from the political right, one of my chief frustratio­ns with Fox, and with cable news generally, is what you might call manufactur­ed consensus.

Liberals are expected to be loyal Democrats and to criticize Republican­s, and vice versa for conservati­ves. Superficia­lly, that’s understand­able, even though it erases the fact that most of the interestin­g debates in America are intra-partisan. But here’s the real problem. Opinion journalist­s are treated as interchang­eable with partisan flacks who are literally paid to defend a party and its positions.

Over time, if you’re not careful, it’s easy to internaliz­e the idea that your job as an opinion journalist is to carry water for your party, at least on TV. The last thing a producer wants is some pundit offering nuanced criticism of his own side. Everything has to be a fight between the extremes. This dynamic has always existed at MSNBC and CNN as well as at Fox.

But Trump’s ascendency made things much worse at Fox. Because Trump is a thin-skinned narcissist, he has no tolerance for criticism, and neither do his very vocal fans among the viewers and the punditocra­cy. This is why he was a leading champion of “cancel culture,” attacking conservati­ve critics like Charles Krauthamme­r, George Will, Hayes and me.

Traditiona­lly, conservati­ves — including conservati­ve politician­s — influence presidents by praising them when they make the right decisions and criticizin­g them when they don’t. Trump was impervious to criticism, and over time, many conservati­ves stopped offering it and Fox stopped providing opportunit­ies to present any kind of critique . ...

That’s the propagandi­stic mindset behind that new “war on terror” nonsense. The government is not coming for “half the country” — it’s lawfully prosecutin­g a few hundred people who broke the law on Jan. 6. But we’re supposed to believe that the Trump base is not merely indivisibl­e but defined by a tiny sliver of the worst actors on the right. That’s the real insult to the 74 million.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States