Springfield News-Sun

Razing of presumed Wright Brothers site stirs debate

-

I read with horror a story that the Wright brothers’ bicycle shop faces demolition. For years my home state of North Carolina has claimed to be “First in Flight,” because, I suppose some of your readers know, the Wright brothers flew from the sand dunes of Kitty Hawk, N.C., in December 1903.

I’m aware of, shall I say, the “polite discord” between our two states as the nation prepared to celebrate the centennial of flight in 2003. About that time, or maybe since then, I believe I have seen Ohio referred to as the “Birthplace of Aviation,” because it was in your city that Wilbur and Orville first dreamed of flying and conducted many experiment­s that lead to the production of their test kites and their first airplanes.

Have the city officials and citizens of Dayton no shame? How in the world can they allow this historic landmark to be demolished?

I beg of someone in authority in Dayton, some historical society, a philanthro­pist, some corporatio­n or an entreprene­ur to save such a valued landmark.

Not only should the bicycle shop be preserved, it should be turned into a museum. If Dayton can’t handle such a project, perhaps someone there should contact the Ford Museum in Dearborn, Mi. JAMES H. DILDA, LT. COL., USAF (RET.), KERNERSVIL­LE NC

Following the decision to raze the old Gem City Ice Cream building — presumed to be the site of the first Wright brothers bicycle shop — there has been a widespread reaction on the Internet driven, as these social media storms often are, by misinforma­tion.

There is a myth-conception that some interior walls define the Wright shop. Painstakin­g research by Matthew Yanney has shown the building began its life as the Nicholas Block in 1894 and that two structures — the home of the former owners and a wooden building that may have served as the Wright’s shop in 1892 — were razed to make way for its constructi­on. There’s nothing left of the original wooden building.

There is also a question of whether the brothers were here at all. The only record is a remark that Orville made to Henry Ford in 1937 at the dedication of the reconstruc­ted Wright shop and home at Greenfield Village.

The advertisem­ents in the Dayton papers from the early 1890s put the Wrights at 1015 W. Third St.; nothing ties them to 1005 W. Third St. Orville may have misspoken, or his words were recorded incorrectl­y.

Furthermor­e, whether it was 1005 or 1015 W. Third St., nothing occurred there of any historical importance. The Wright brothers sold other people’s bicycles at their first shop.

It’s nothing like, say,

1127 W. Third St. — their fourth or fifth location — where the Wright brothers decided to investigat­e the possibilit­y that man could fly, where they designed and built experiment­al kites, gliders and Flyers.

This is the spot where aviation began.

What makes this reaction to the razing of the Gem City Ice Cream building so prepostero­us is not just its dubious historical value, but that a location two blocks away with infinitely more value is marked with a plaque and some grass.

Wouldn’t the effort be better expended to create something meaningful at a place where something meaningful happened? NICK ENGLER, DIRECTOR WRIGHT BROTHERS AEROPLANE COMPANY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States