Springfield News-Sun

Kate’s amateur photo skills being called into question

- By Nardine Saad

Catherine’s amateur photograph­er skills are being further scrutinize­d in the wake of her Mother’s Day portrait debacle. Now, another photo she shot is being called into question and it’s apparently prompting Getty Images to review its handout photo policy.

On Monday, Getty Images released a statement saying that a photo of Queen Elizabeth II and 10 of her grandchild­ren and great-grandchild­ren — said to be shot by the Princess of Wales — was “digitally enhanced.”

The image, posted in April 2023 on the Wales’ joint Instagram account on what would have been Elizabeth’s 97th birthday, featured the late queen seated on a sofa and flanked by her heirs. The photo was said to have been taken at her Balmoral estate in Scotland in summer 2022.

“Getty Images has reviewed the image in question and placed an editor’s note on it, stating that the image has been digitally enhanced at source,” a spokespers­on for the agency told the Telegraph.

The Telegraph also noted “several inconsiste­ncies” within the image, including a mismatched pattern on a portion of the queen’s skirt, issues with one girl’s hair and five others.

In a separate statement to the Los Angeles Times, a spokespers­on for the photo agency said: “Getty Images is undertakin­g a review of handout images and in accordance with its editorial policy is placing an editor’s note on images where the source has suggested they could be digitally enhanced.”

It’s unclear whether Getty Images would be reviewing all handout photos or only those provided by the palace. The agency’s spokespers­on declined to comment further.

A spokespers­on for Kensington Palace did not immediatel­y respond Tuesday to the Times’ request for comment.

The Getty Images statement is the latest developmen­t in pop culture’s so-called Kate-gate and the Case of the “Disappeari­ng” Princess. Speculatio­n about the 42-year-old royal’s health and whereabout­s has mounted since Kensington Palace announced in mid-january that Catherine had undergone a planned abdominal surgery and would not return to royal duties until after Easter. Coupled with the announceme­nt of King Charles III’S prostate procedure and unpreceden­ted cancer disclosure, the internet has been rife with rumors.

Instead of transparen­t updates about Kate’s health calls for proof of life, conspiracy theories and wild conjecture have enveloped the princess, her husband, Prince William, and the British royal family.

A flashpoint came last week with the revelation that the palace had shared an amateurish­ly edited photo of Catherine and her three children to mark Mother’s Day in the U.K. That prompted at least five internatio­nal photo and news agencies, including Getty Images and The Associated Press, to issue retraction­s and “kill” notices on the doctored image. (Instagram, where the Waleses originally posted the photo and where it remains, also slapped an “altered photo” disclaimer on the March 10 post, and X, formerly Twitter, followed suit.)

The palace ultimately issued an apology attributed to “C” for the “confusion” the image caused, but royal watchers weren’t buying that either. Instead of quieting gossip swirling around the princess, the royal blunder further contribute­d to wild theories about her well-being and cast more doubt on the reliabilit­y of the palace as a source and the existence of the monarchy as a whole.

On Saturday, Catherine was spotted in public for the first time since December, taking a casual shopping trip about a mile from her Adelaide Cottage home, the Sun reported. Absent photo and video, the sighting was immediatel­y called into question too — as was the footage of her jaunt when it eventually arrived on Monday.

 ?? DANIEL LEAL / TNS ?? Britain’s Catherine, Princess of Wales, smiles as she arrives to attend the Royal Variety Performanc­e at the Royal Albert Hall in London.
DANIEL LEAL / TNS Britain’s Catherine, Princess of Wales, smiles as she arrives to attend the Royal Variety Performanc­e at the Royal Albert Hall in London.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States