St. Cloud Times

Congress scrambles to avoid shutdown

Some members seeing need for 3rd extension

- Riley Beggin

WASHINGTON – There are nine days until the country once again faces the possibilit­y of a government shutdown because Congress failed to fund key agencies serving Americans.

Funding for agricultur­e, energy and water, military constructi­on and veterans affairs, transporta­tion and housing programs will expire on Jan. 19. The rest of the government's funding expires on Feb. 2.

In an attempt to avoid that fate, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., announced a plan on Sunday. The lawmakers called for a spending package in line with the debt ceiling deal struck between former Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and President Joe Biden, around $1.66 trillion total.

Their agreement came weeks after Congress extended its own government funding deadline for the second time in recent months. The budget is officially due every year on Sept. 30, and the first extension cost McCarthy his job after a handful of Republican­s rebelled while he worked across the aisle with Democrats.

Setting an overall funding level is the first step to keeping the government open, but lawmakers will still have to agree on funding levels for each of 12 appropriat­ions bills, work out policy disagreeme­nts and dodge political infighting if they hope to avoid a shutdown.

Passing full spending bills in Congress' time frame will be tough. So much so that multiple members are asking to push the deadline once again.

On Tuesday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said there will “obviously” need to be another continuing resolution, a temporary measure that kicks the can down the road for lawmakers as they negotiate.

The second-ranking Republican, Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., also suggested punting to March: “We're not going to get all the appropriat­ion bills done by the coming deadline.”

Johnson, who previously pledged not to pass another short-term extension, demurred when asked about the possibilit­y Tuesday, saying House Republican­s are “pedal to the

metal” on the budget.

Schumer was more optimistic: There’s “real consensus” among Republican and Democratic leadership in both chambers, he said. “We’re going to fight as hard as we can to get this done as soon as possible.”

Democrats have repeatedly said they are against a full-year extension – an option Johnson floated as an alternativ­e to hitting the budget deadline. That would extend current funding levels through the fiscal year and allow lawmakers to focus on crafting a budget for the next one, which begins in October.

Senate Democrats have said that option is a no-go because it would trigger across-the-board budget cuts that would disproport­ionately impact nondefense spending, due to the McCarthy-Biden deal to raise the debt ceiling.

House Republican­s’ most conservati­ve members are outraged by the total spending numbers Johnson and Schumer announced Sunday, arguing the agreement doesn’t make enough cuts. The ultraconse­rvative Freedom Caucus quickly deemed the spending agreement “a total failure.”

Its fury echoes the fight that shook Washington last year: House Republican­s kicked McCarthy out of leadership for passing a funding extension to avert a shutdown. When Johnson proposed a second extension in November, 93 Republican­s voted against it, and it passed with more Democratic support than GOP votes.

At the time, the caucus did not threaten to topple its leader again. But this time, Johnson may not get the same chance.

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, didn’t rule out ousting Johnson over the funding agreement, though he noted it wasn’t his preferred solution. “Johnson is doing all the same stupid crap that we opposed,” he told Fox News.

The fiery reaction from his own caucus may complicate Johnson’s ability to shepherd a full budget or another extension through the House. House Republican­s have an even slimmer majority than they had last year, as McCarthy resigned, Rep. Bill Johnson, R-Ohio, left for another job, and Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y, was expelled.

That means the House will have 219 Republican­s and 213 Democrats, leaving Republican­s only three votes to spare – an incredibly fragile majority that was unstable even before the departures.

Republican­s’ priorities

The backlash from right-wing Republican­s puts additional pressure on Johnson to deliver conservati­ve policy priorities that will feel like a win to his caucus.

The House GOP has previously proposed conservati­ve policies be added to the budget, such as legislatio­n that would bar federal funding for hospitals or organizati­ons that train medical providers in abortions. They have also zeroed in on a Health and Human Services rule to prevent health care discrimina­tion against LGBTQ people, schools that allow transgende­r athletes to participat­e in sports and more.

“By agreeing to more excessive spending, surely there are really big policy wins? Right?!?,” Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, wrote on X.

Johnson said Tuesday that’s the plan.

“This allows us to fight for our policy priorities, for our policy riders,” he told reporters. “Our appropriat­ors are resolute on doing that. The members are excited about getting that done.”

But Democrats have repeatedly said they won’t support any budget legislatio­n that includes those policy add-ons, referring to them as “poison pills.”

“We will not be able to get any of our bills done if House Republican­s insist on partisan poison pills that we all know are non-starters,” Senate Appropriat­ions Committee Chair Patty Murray, D-Wash., said in a statement Tuesday.

Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., told reporters that the House Republican policy priorities face an uphill climb because the Senate and White House are controlled by Democrats

“It makes it really difficult,” he said. “They’re going to have to work it out.”

 ?? ?? Schumer
Schumer
 ?? ?? Johnson
Johnson

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States