Stamford Advocate

Restaurant­s press for indoor dining

Lamont feels pressure as industry pushes for full reopening

- By Ken Dixon and Alexander Soule

Under increasing pressure from the state’s devastated restaurant industry, Gov. Ned Lamont said Wednesday that if the proper procedures for outside service are successful, diners might be allowed to eat inside by June 20 or earlier.

Lamont defended his decision to allow only alfresco seating when restaurant­s are allowed a soft reopening on May 20, stressing that he and state health officials want to see how the industry and the public reacts.

The reopening of restaurant­s is highly anticipate­d as Connecticu­t starts to emerge from the backside of the pandemic, the fear of crowded public places, and the surge in unemployme­nt.

“I’m going to err on the side of caution,” said Lamont. “I think we are one of the earlier states to allow outside dining. Why outside, not inside? You’re 90 percent more likely to catch the infection inside than you are outside, following even some of the best protocols. I think we’re going to get the inside dining, but I think it’s not simply a matter of the state saying June 20, it’s also a matter of giving the consumers confidence.”

The state Department of Public Health in Wednesday reported an additional 84 COVID-19-related

fatalities, bringing the total to 3,125. A net decline of 31 hospitaliz­ation brought the current total to 1,158.

Regardless of the next steps after the May 20 partial reopening, a lot has to happen just for that first phase to kick in. On Wednesday, Lamont’s administra­tion released a comprehens­ive outline of allowances municipali­ties can offer to free up seating.

The executive order set off a scramble among cities and towns to set up approvals for the eateries in their jurisdicti­ons. Municipali­ties are not allowed to charge fees as part of the process. Breweries will be allowed to serve patrons outside if there are food trucks there.

While Lamont used the June 20 target, he indicated that indoor eating could be allowed earlier in the month, but he dismissed a June 3 date requested earlier in the day by restaurate­urs and some of their supporters in related industries.

During the governor’s daily meeting with reporters, he was joined by two state lawmakers who are both in the restaurant business and did not push back on the June 20 date.

Sen. Paul Formica, REast

Lyme, the owner of a combinatio­n fish market and restaurant in his hometown, said a lot is at stake and if restaurant­s open too soon and the coronaviru­s pandemic heats up again, the industry that has been nearly idled by the pandemic could slide into even deeper trouble.

“I don’t want to give up July and August for a hurried opening, but it’s up to people to take personal responsibi­lity if we’re going to make this work,” Formica said via teleconfer­ence.

Sen. Christine Cohen, the owner of a fast-casual, bagel-centric spot on the Post Road in Madison, said that her business dropped off by about 50 percent and has come back only slightly in recent days. “Public health has to be paramount in this,” Cohen said.

“Most people are following the safety protocols, they’re wearing masks when they come to pickup their orders,” Cohen said. “I think we’re ready. It remains to be seen whether I will open up outdoor tables for dining. I’ve heard from a lot of restaurant­s as well. They’re concerned with getting the proper equipment in time, having the PPE available for their employees, making sure they have the sanitizer and the cleaning wipes available, making sure they have those plexiglass divides at cashiers and cash registers, having a touch-less payment option.”

During the morning rush hour Lamont said in an interview on classic-rock station WPLR that he thought the June 20 date for some indoor dining was a good target.

“We’ll take a look at restaurant­s, for example, and say the outside dining, the protocols were strictly enforced,” Lamont said. “People followed it, people wore their masks. You can take a look at inside dining at that point, because it worked on the outside.”

Lamont made his remarks just hours before about 130 industry supporters, including farms, hotels and tourism interests, asked Lamont to begin some level of indoor dining service by Wednesday June 3 because outdoors-only, like the pickup service and delivery service over the last two months, is not sustainabl­e and cannot regain more than a fraction of the industry’s jobs.

“We hope the proposed compromise­s we’ve put forward will be acceptable to him and his team, and that Connecticu­t’s local restaurant industry and the 160,000 people it employs will be protected and helped during this incredibly difficult period,” said Scott Dolch, executive director of the 1,400-member

Restaurant Associatio­n, which issued a letter in which they stressed the need to open more fully to stay alive.

The associatio­n proposed an initial limit of 50-percent occupancy indoors; no physical contact with staff; no bar activity; mandatory gloves and masks for staff; intensive cleaning between customers, new technology for contact-less payment and menu presentati­on; and encouragin­g older customers to eat outdoors. Overall, there are about 8,500 restaurant­s in Connecticu­t.

Businesses that signed the petition included Aspetuck Brew Lab in Bridgeport, food purveyors such as Island Oysters in Norwalk, and the regional destinatio­ns Foxwoods

Resort Casino and Mohegan Sun in eastern Connecticu­t.

“We understand why some outside the restaurant industry might believe that outdoor dining will allow restaurant­s to stay in business during this time, but it simply isn’t true,” the associatio­n said. “While some additional outdoor dining should absolutely be allowed, assuming it is a solution for these businesses it is unfortunat­ely a false hope. Many restaurant­s are already failing — hundreds of more will permanentl­y shutter in the weeks ahead if we don’t give them a chance to prove they can begin serving the public safely indoors.”

The associatio­n has created a “Connecticu­t RestauConn­ecticut rant Promise” for venues to certify steps they are taking to ensure customers are protected from contractin­g the coronaviru­s.

The clock is ticking for any restaurant­s that borrowed money under the Paycheck Protection Program of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which allows small businesses to cover up to eight weeks of payroll with the loans forgiven if they do not lay off employees.

More than 18,400 Connecticu­t businesses won funding in the first round of PPP, giving them until mid-June to assess their cash flow before deciding whether to retain their full staff or lay off some workers – which would leave them liable for paying back a portion of those loans.

“We believe that limited, safe indoor dining is possible,” said the business owners in the letter to the governor. “As malls, hair salons and others are allowed to gradually begin indoor service, as they should be, it makes sense restaurant­s would also be allowed some limited indoor service.”

“It’s absolutely true that restaurant­s, like every type of business, present unique challenges,” Dolch added. “Simply put, this will be a very different dining experience from what anyone is used to in the past.”

 ??  ?? Lamont
Lamont
 ?? Erik Trautmann / Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? A recent drive-through coronaviru­s testing station in Westport.
Erik Trautmann / Hearst Connecticu­t Media A recent drive-through coronaviru­s testing station in Westport.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States