Stamford Advocate

Conn. gas tax hike possible with rates now below national average

- By Keith M. Phaneuf

With tolls off the table in 2021, state officials could look to gasoline tax hikes to salvage Connecticu­t’s imperiled transporta­tion program.

While neither Gov. Ned Lamont nor legislator­s have proposed an increase, one of the argument most frequently used to defeat it — Connecticu­t’s gas taxes are among the nation’s highest — no longer holds true.

An analysis of states’ fuel tax burdens by the American Petroleum Institute showed Connecticu­t’s levies — which contribute about 36 cents per gallon to the price — rank slightly below the national average and 15th nationwide.

The API, a national trade associatio­n for the oil and natural gas industry, did rank Connecticu­t’s 69cents-per-gallon diesel tax ninth overall among states, and seven pennies greater than the national average.

“I do anticipate a conversati­on around fuel taxes” during the next General Assembly session, said Rep. Roland Lemar, D-New Haven, cochairman of the Transporta­tion Committee. The session convenes Jan. 6.

Lemar, who said Connecticu­t should join the growing list of states exploring road usage charges, added that the transporta­tion funding debate can’t be postponed without severe economic risk.

“We have a multibilli­on-dollar asset base … that requires substantia­l, continued investment,” Lemar said, referring to Connecticu­t’s aging, overcrowde­d system of highways, bridges and rail lines. “In order to meet the needs of a 21st-century transporta­tion network, we need new revenues.”

State analysts recently projected the budget’s $1.7 billion Special Transporta­tion Fund will run in deficit this fiscal year and in the next three, going insolvent in 2024.

Transporta­tion officials say Connecticu­t spends barely enough now to maintain a state of good repair, with very little for improvemen­ts to speed up travel and reduce congestion.

Lamont has said he won’t pitch tolls for a third successive year but hasn’t weighed in on the issue of fuel taxes. Max Reiss, his communicat­ions director, said the transporta­tion funding issue hasn’t gone away and it’s important some lawmakers are recognizin­g that.

“Members of the General Assembly must come prepared in the next session to bring resolution to this longstandi­ng issue and help move Connecticu­t’s economy forward through infrastruc­ture improvemen­ts,” Reiss said.

Lamont had hoped to bolster the transporta­tion fund with toll revenues, but lawmakers balked at a plan to charge all vehicles in 2019 and a

proposal last January to toll just trucks.

The governor was trying to avoid asking for more at the pumps from consumers, who already provide almost $700 million, or about 40 percent of the revenue needed to support the STF, through two taxes.

Many are familiar with the 25cents-per-gallon, retail gasoline tax, which hasn’t changed since mid-2000.

Less known is the Petroleum Products Gross Receipts Tax, which charges 8.1 percent on wholesale transactio­ns involving gasoline and other fuels. Another surcharge effectivel­y raises that tax to 8.81 percent. But gas station owners have long conceded that they build this expense into the retail price, meaning consumers pay that as well.

Based on wholesale prices in Connecticu­t this week, the gross receipts tax adds about 11 cents per gallon to the price of gasoline. The wholesale price — and the resulting tax — were nearly the same back in July when the API analysis was compiled, according to the Connecticu­t Energy Marketers Associatio­n.

Combine the retail and wholesale taxes, and Connecticu­t motorists pay 36 cents per gallon, well below the national average of almost 43.5 cents.

Not that long ago, though, it was a different story.

After three successive summer hikes of the wholesale tax combined with several prolonged spikes in gasoline prices, Connecticu­t motorists in 2008 were pumping 52 cents per gallon into the state’s coffers — the second-highest rate among all states.

But with retail prices approachin­g $4.40 per gallon here in the spring of 2008, then-Gov. M. Jodi Rell and the legislatur­e canceled a fourth wholesale fuel tax hike originally scheduled for July 2008.

And that levy has only increased once since then, in the summer of 2013.

Since then, though, more than half of all states have increased gasoline taxes while Connecticu­t has stood pat.

Sen. John Fonfara, D-Hartford, co-chairman of the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee, also expects a 2021 debate on increasing fuel taxes.

Fonfara did not propose any hikes Tuesday. But if one is considered, he said, it should involve the gross receipts tax — and reform a longstandi­ng problem with that levy at the same time.

Such a move could substitute a percentage-based tax, linked to the price of gasoline, with a flat rate, such as the 25-cent retail gas tax.

Businesses and consumers have long complained that because the tax is based on a percentage of the wholesale price, it fluctuates sharply due to spikes and troughs in the oil market.

Chris Herb, president of the Connecticu­t Energy Marketers Associatio­n, agreed. If higher fuel taxes are needed to maintain the transporta­tion program, a more stable wholesale levy is the place to start.

“Consumers, small businesses and the state — having a predictabl­e revenue stream is in their best interest from a budgeting standpoint,” he said.

But Rep. Sean Scanlon, D-Guilford, the finance committee’s other cochair, was wary of raising gasoline taxes, though he also predicted legislator­s will want to consider them next year.

Scanlon, who supported tolls on cars and trucks — provided the system was limited and not spread across all highways — said many motorists from out-of-state can avoid Connecticu­t’s gas tax hikes simply by filling up before crossing the border.

“We have to figure out a way so that just Connecticu­t residents are not bearing the burden,” he said.

Others agreed fuel tax hikes will be difficult — for reasons of trust.

Patrick Sasser, leader of No Tolls CT, said many from his group would fight gas tax hikes with equal intensity, given the state’s track record.

Between 2006 and 2014, Connecticu­t spent more than $1 billion in fuel tax receipts on non-transporta­tion programs.

“The state hasn’t proven to us they’ve been fiscally responsibl­e,” Sasser said.

Lamont also contribute­d to the distrust surroundin­g transporta­tion shortly after he took office in January 2019, said House Minority Leader Vincent J. Candelora, R-North Branford.

The governor and his fellow Democrats in the legislatur­e’s majority shaved $170 million off pledged sales tax revenue transfers to transporta­tion over two years in their first biennial budget together.

And that came a few months after voters, by an eight-to-one margin, ratified the so-called “lockbox” amendment to the state Constituti­on that prohibits officials — once a new funding source for transporta­tion has been establishe­d — from spending the funds on something else.

 ?? Christian Abraham / Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? A customer fills his pickup truck at the Citgo station on Housatonic Avenue in Bridgeport on Wednesday.
Christian Abraham / Hearst Connecticu­t Media A customer fills his pickup truck at the Citgo station on Housatonic Avenue in Bridgeport on Wednesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States