Stamford Advocate

Conn. to get $1.8M in settlement with medical-device manufactur­er

- By Paul Schott

Connecticu­t will receive approximat­ely $1.8 million from a nearly $189 million settlement that 47 states and the District of Columbia have reached with Boston Scientific Corp., to resolve allegation­s that the company deceptivel­y marketed transvagin­al surgical-mesh products, state officials announced Wednesday.

Boston Scientific misled millions of women through marketing that disguised the dangers of surgical mesh, with thousands of women suffering serious complicati­ons, alleged state Attorney General William Tong.

In addition to the fine, the settlement requires

Boston Scientific to undertake marketing, training and clinical-trial reforms to “ensure this type of preventabl­e and unacceptab­le tragedy never happens again,” Tong

said in a statement.

Surgical mesh is a synthetic woven fabric implanted in the pelvic floor through the vagina to treat common health conditions including stress urinary incontinen­ce and pelvic organ prolapse. Such conditions are due to a weakening in pelvicfloo­r muscles caused by factors including childbirth and age.

“This case is another example of the serious consequenc­es deceptive advertisin­g can have on consumers,” state Consumer Protection Commission­er Michelle Seagull said in a statement. “The terms of this settlement are an important step toward protecting women from further harm due to the poor marketing and misreprese­ntation of the risks associated with surgical mesh by Boston Scientific.”

The state alleges that Marlboroug­h, Mass.-headquarte­red Boston Scientific misreprese­nted the safety of its products by failing to fully disclose “potential serious and irreversib­le complicati­ons” caused by mesh, including chronic pain, voiding dysfunctio­n and the new onset of incontinen­ce.

“We feel this settlement, which is not an admission of misconduct or liability, is in the best interests of the company and its shareholde­rs,” Boston Scientific said in a statement. “We are pleased to resolve this dispute and to continue focusing on delivering innovative products and solutions to physicians and patients.”

The investigat­ion that resulted in the settlement was led by California and Washington along with Florida, Indiana, Maryland, Ohio, South Carolina and Texas.

From Connecticu­t’s $1.8 million settlement share, $200,000 and $100,000 will, respective­ly, be allocated to funds maintained by the Attorney General’s Office and Department of Consumer Protection that support consumer-protection programs. The remainder of the settlement money will go to the state’s general fund.

During the past year and a half, Connecticu­t has reached two other, similar settlement­s related to allegedly deceptive marketing of transvagin­al surgical-mesh devices.

Last September, it joined a 48state agreement that required C.R. Bard Inc., and its parent company Becton, Dickinson and Co., to pay $60 million.

In October 2019, it participat­ed in a 40-state settlement requiring Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary Ethicon Inc., to pay nearly $117 million.

 ?? Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo ?? Connecticu­t Attorney General William Tong, center, New Haven Mayor Justin Elicker, right, and Connecticu­t Consumer Protection Commission­er Michelle Seagull, left, speak at Hillhouse High School in New Haven.
Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo Connecticu­t Attorney General William Tong, center, New Haven Mayor Justin Elicker, right, and Connecticu­t Consumer Protection Commission­er Michelle Seagull, left, speak at Hillhouse High School in New Haven.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States