Stamford Advocate

Risks of getting J&J shot: What you need to know

- By Kasturi Pananjady

In weighing all their options on Friday, federal regulators made the decision to lift their suspension of the use of the one-shot Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine for a simple reason: It might just save your life.

That’s true even for women age 18 to 49. So far, 13 of 15 reported cases of rare blood clotting and low platelets among J&J shot recipients have occurred among that demographi­c, and regulators believe that it is likely the vaccine is associated with the condition.

Three have died and seven have been hospitaliz­ed, with four in intensive care. The remaining five have been discharged.

Connecticu­t has resumed offering J&J to residents in addition to the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines that have been available to residents since the beginning of the year.

With 136,000 J&J doses in reserve and a number of walk-up clinics opening in coming days, residents will have more ways to get the single-shot option.

But will they? Or will the “pause” have scared away people that could benefit from it the most?

“Oftentimes people kind of overread the relative risks,” said Josh Geballe, the state’s chief operating officer, at a press conference on Monday. “So there was a little bit of initial apprehensi­on. I think it will take some time to see how that plays out.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administra­tion “have full confidence that this vaccine’s known and potential benefits outweigh its known and potential risks in individual­s 18 years of age and older,” FDA Acting Commission­er Janet Woodcock said during a press conference Friday night.

The agencies chose not to limit the use of the vaccine by age or gender but to add a warning label for young women.

Here’s a walk-through of the numbers behind the FDA’s decision — and what they mean. There are two parts to determinin­g whether to take the J&J vaccine:

Understand­ing the implicatio­ns of making a decision, and understand­ing the implicatio­ns of inaction in the face of the morbidity and mortality dangers posed by COVID-19.

What are the risks of getting the J&J vaccine?

Based on available data, the risk varies based on demographi­c characteri­stics. Reported cases have largely clustered by gender, although one man developed the condition in a Johnson & Johnson clinical trial.

Among the 15 women, “the age ranged from 18 to 59, with a median age of 37,” Rochelle Walensky, the director of the CDC, said during a press conference Friday night.

These cases include the six that were initially reported; in addition, the CDC “broadened our case definition to make sure we were capturing all of the possible cases,” she said.

Part of the rationale behind the pause was also to help physicians understand how to treat the condition; the CDC specifical­ly discourage­d the use of heparin, a common blood thinner, when it put the pause into effect.

“Of the additional cases that were reported to the CDC, none of them received heparin, likely improving their outcome and demonstrat­ing that our systems worked,” Walensky said.

On Friday, the Advisory Committee on Immunizati­on Practices discussed additional updates on the management of the condition, including recommendi­ng other anti-coagulants and cautioning against platelet infusion.

Current guidance also recommends a course of treatment with immunoglob­ulins “that appears to reverse this process in, at least, a number of people who received it,” said Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA, during a press conference Friday night.

What are the benefits of getting the J&J vaccine for you?

While the risk of complicati­ons may vary by age and gender, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine has shown to be effective at preventing illness across demographi­c groups, FDA data show.

In the J&J trials, efficacy was measured in the relative reduction of the risk of contractin­g COVID-19 and was found to be

72%.

The efficacy rate is widely misunderst­ood to mean that people still have a 30% chance of contractin­g COVID after vaccinatio­n with J&J. This would only be true if infection rates were so high that everyone without protection was guaranteed to get sick with COVID-19, which isn’t the case.

The true risk of contractin­g the virus after vaccinatio­n is much lower, depending on present rates of community transmissi­on. Whatever the present risk of getting infected, it would reduce by 72% on average post-J&J vaccinatio­n.

But these rates don’t take into account the most serious outcome of contractin­g COVID-19: death. In the clinical trial, none of the J&J recipients died; 16 in the placebo group did.

The data also show that 28 days after vaccinatio­n, none of the J&J recipients required medical interventi­on, which was defined separately from severe COVID. Five people in the placebo group did, however.

What are the consequenc­es for you of not getting vaccinated at all?

If vaccinatio­n carries risks, the decision not to get vaccinated carries greater risks.

The CDC’s Advisory Panel on Immunizati­on Practices considered

the chances of being hospitaliz­ed and dying of COVID against any risk posed by the vaccine and concluded that the vaccine was beneficial on balance for individual­s of all demographi­cs under considerat­ion.

What are your other options?

Connecticu­t continues to receive the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, both of which use different biotechnol­ogy — based on mRNA — than the J&J, which is an adenovirus vaccine.

The CDC has not identified any cases of these rare blood clots and low platelet counts among recipients of either; 5.2 million doses have been administer­ed in the United States so far, per the CDC.

Five potential cases of the rare clotting were identified but without the low platelet count observed in the case of the J&J vaccine.

“Individual­s with questions about which vaccine is right for them should discuss their options with a medical provider,” Woodcock said.

Why are the CDC and FDA making this your decision?

Unlike some European regulators in the case of another adenovirus vaccine, the CDC and FDA did not limit the use of the J&J but chose instead to add a

warning label.

Modeling shows that limiting the Johnson & Johnson vaccine to individual­s above 50 would have severely reduced the vaccine’s ability to prevent hospitaliz­ations and deaths nationally in all transmissi­on scenarios.

Vaccinatio­n is as much about a community as it is about an individual; vaccines have been proven to be effective at reducing transmissi­on of the disease in addition to conferring immunity upon their recipients.

The estimates look at direct and indirect benefits of vaccinatio­n with J&J over a six-month period in the United States.

Population-level modeling aside, the CDC also wanted to be sensitive to the fact that “some people want a one-and-done. Some people will not have access to another vaccine in the near future, and I think that this risk trade-off is one that people have to individual­ly measure for themselves,” Walensky said.

The public should take heart in the fact that the CDC was able to identify rare clots, act on the knowledge quickly and conduct “rational risk-benefit analysis, which was done in the open,” said Saad Omer, director of the Yale Institute for Global Health. “This should be reassuring to people.”

 ?? Mary Altaffer / Associated Press ?? In this April 8 file photo, the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine is seen at a pop-up vaccinatio­n site in the Staten Island borough of New York.
Mary Altaffer / Associated Press In this April 8 file photo, the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine is seen at a pop-up vaccinatio­n site in the Staten Island borough of New York.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States