Stamford Advocate

Military sexual assault survivors speak out as Congress eyes better protection­s

- By Peggy McCarthy This story was reported under a partnershi­p with the Connecticu­t Health I-Team (c-hit.org), a nonprofit news organizati­on dedicated to health reporting.

Debra Geske, a Navy technician, was enjoying cranberry juice at a bar in Guam when a male sailor spiked it with a drug when she wasn’t looking. He and two other sailors drove her home and raped her, she said. “I woke up the next morning full of blood,” she said.

When Geske reported the rape to her petty officer in 2000, he said he couldn’t respond until higherups arrived on a Navy ship four weeks later. Then, officials told her it was a “he said, she said” scenario, and “they did nothing,” she said. “I felt at the time like I didn’t matter,” said the Glastonbur­y resident.

Maureen Gard Friedly said she was sexually assaulted by her Marine Corps platoon leader — whom she considered a friend — in 2006. Her commanders told the two to work out their problems and kept them in the same classes and living area. She was told that the notes from an interview about her complaint were lost, and she wasn’t given another interview. “My chain of command really let me down,” she said.

Sexual assaults, rape and sexual harassment in the military continue to occur in large numbers. In 2020, 6,290 people reported being sexually assaulted in the military, according to the Department of Defense, but victim advocates say that number falls short of actual cases. Advocates cite fear of repercussi­on and the requiremen­t of reporting to a commander — who may be the assailant — as reasons for the lack of reporting.

The last time the DOD conducted a survey was in 2018, when 20,500 respondent­s said they were sexually assaulted in the military, up from 14,900 in 2016. The DOD, which conducts surveys every two years, did not do one in 2020.

Now, after a decade of efforts to

remove the prosecutio­n of military sexual trauma from the jurisdicti­on of commanders, Congress is poised to take action that would put the responsibi­lity for prosecutin­g sexual assault cases on independen­t military lawyers.

The move has been hailed as historic. But critics say it doesn’t go far enough because commanders would retain a role in the judicial process, potentiall­y diminishin­g the effect of the independen­t prosecutor­s.

National attention was riveted on the issue when at least 83 women and seven men were sexually assaulted by Navy and Marine aviators attending a 1991 conference called the Tailhook Symposium. Since then, other high-profile cases have occurred. In 2017, Marines solicited and shared nude photos of female colleagues on a Facebook page called Marines United. Last year, Vanessa Guillen, a 20-year-old soldier, was murdered at the Fort Hood Army base in Texas after reporting that she had been sexually harassed.

“I can’t tell you how upset it

makes me” that military officials convinced Congress for years to allow commanders to have authority over military sexual trauma cases, Friedly said.

Chelsea M. Donaldson, an attorney with the Connecticu­t Veterans Legal Center, said she has represente­d 39 MST survivors — 27 men and 12 women — in the past three years. None reported their experience­s to their commanders, she said.

“Pretty much every awful story you can think of, I’ve probably heard a version of, unfortunat­ely,” Donaldson said. She cited gang rapes, drug-facilitate­d rapes, and sexual hazing in boot camp, where soldiers are forced to strip and stand naked in front of each other. “I’m so surprised by how awful human beings can be to one another,” she said.

This year, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin supported requiring independen­t military prosecutor­s in sexual assault cases. The provision is included in the $768.2 billion National Defense Authorizat­ion Act, which was approved this week by the U.S. House of Representa­tives. It requires that survivors of sexual assault be informed of the dispositio­n of cases against their perpetrato­rs, requires tracking of retaliatio­n against survivors of military sexual trauma, and creates an Office of Special Trial Counsel in each service, answerable to a civilian official. It criminaliz­es sexual harassment but doesn’t take the crime’s jurisdicti­on away from commanders.

A bipartisan majority of Congress, including Connecticu­t U.S. Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy and U.S. Rep. Jahana Hayes, D-5, signed onto a stronger proposal. It would completely eliminate commanders’ roles in handling the prosecutio­n of nonmilitar­y felonies. Sponsors plan to pursue this in separate legislatio­n.

A statement by Protect Our Defenders, an advocacy group devoted to reducing military sexual trauma, called the use of independen­t prosecutor­s “the most significan­t military justice reform in our nation’s history” and “a momentous step forward.”

However, its praise was qualified because the commanders would retain some judicial authority, including over court-martial proceeding­s and who would serve on them. Col. Don M. Christense­n, Protect Our Defenders president, said this “erodes the independen­ce” of the prosecutor­s and ignores concerns of MST survivors that commanders will “still have too much influence.”

Friedly agreed. A former Meriden resident, she was an activist for MST survivors while attending Quinnipiac University and continues to advocate for them in Texas, where she now lives.

She said commanders retaining some judicial authority insults survivors. “Like we won’t see through the wool and think this is some sort of improvemen­t,” Friedly said. “As long as the chain of command has involvemen­t in prosecutio­n and decision-making, we will continue to see a rise in sexual crime, little to no punishment for those found to have been guilty, and a decrease in reporting,” she said.

Friedly, a married mother of two, said if there had been independen­t prosecutor­s when she was assaulted at the age of 18, she wouldn’t be living with post-traumatic stress disorder, wouldn’t have lost trust in people, and wouldn’t be so fearful and suspicious of others.

She attends an equine-assisted psychother­apy program to help deal with her MST and runs occasional support groups for other female MST survivors.

Geske expressed hope that having independen­t prosecutor­s would increase MST reporting because it might reduce fear of repercussi­on. “They told me I shouldn’t be in the military if I was going to complain about somebody sexually harassing me,” said Geske, who said she was gang-raped when she was 20.

Advocates said new laws need to be accompanie­d by cultural changes in the military. “That plays a lot into this whole issue,” Friedly said. She recalled a Marine nickname, “WM,” which she said meant both “woman Marine” and “walking mattress.”

Donaldson, of the CVLC, said it’s important to acknowledg­e that men also get sexually harassed, raped and assaulted. A July Rand Corp. report for the Pentagon estimated that 1 in 16 women and 1 in 143 men had been sexually assaulted in the military.

U.S. Rep. Jackie Speier, a Democrat from California, first introduced legislatio­n in 2011, and U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, a Democrat from New York, introduced legislatio­n in 2013 to take military sexual trauma prosecutio­n out of the chain of command.

“This type of reform was needed decades ago,” Donaldson said.

 ?? Desirea Still / Contribute­d photo ?? In the last three years, attorney Chelsea M. Donaldson of the Connecticu­t Veterans Legal Center has represente­d 39 military sexual trauma survivors — 27 men and 12 women.
Desirea Still / Contribute­d photo In the last three years, attorney Chelsea M. Donaldson of the Connecticu­t Veterans Legal Center has represente­d 39 military sexual trauma survivors — 27 men and 12 women.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States