Stamford Advocate

GOP’s red badge of courage

- By Red Jahncke Red Jahncke is president of the Townsend Group, a management consulting firm in Greenwich.

It is a sad day in America when we cannot agree to disagree. It is sadder when failure in that regard is overtaken by an effort to smear those with whom we disagree.

Last week we saw such a sadder day, with the release, and widespread media magnificat­ion, of a report by a far-left group attacking by name hundreds of Republican officehold­ers nationwide charging them literally with guilt by associatio­n.

The headline in one Connecticu­t media outlet sounded the alarm: “Report finds 16 Connecticu­t legislator­s have joined ‘far-right’ Facebook groups.” Similar headlines appeared across the country. The subject of the “news” articles is a report by the progressiv­e Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights (IREHR) that found that 900 Republican state legislator­s in all 50 states have joined at least one of “789 far-right Facebook groups.”

My first reaction was “horrors! Shiver my timbers!” I was so glad to have an exact scientific­allydeterm­ined number – 789 – enumeratin­g the groups threatenin­g my freedom, all based upon real research. After all, the IREHR name includes “Research,” right?

My immediate response was to begin penning a satirical response: “Connecticu­t’s Congressio­nal Democrats are Communist Sympathize­rs,” presenting actual facts -- Senator Blumenthal addressing a Communist Party of the U.S. gala, etc. The satirical account was to name an equally unimpeacha­ble but fictional source, “a new unavailabl­e report compiled by the National Institute of People with Nothing Better to Do.”

However, maybe a serious critique and response to the IREHR report is a better approach.

First, people join Facebook groups for a myriad of reasons, only one of which is to support or endorse the organizing idea of the group. People are curious. People want to find out what is supposedly so demonic or retrograde about a group. Journalist­s join to conduct investigat­ive work.

Attacking and smearing people for their associatio­ns is despicable… and unconstitu­tional. The Constituti­on protects the right to assemble. Joining an online group is today’s version of assembly.

Actually, given today’s left-wing beliefs, any criticism should really be focused upon Facebook: if the 789 groups constitute any threat whatsoever, Facebook is supposed to monitor or censor or dismantle them, isn’t it? Most conservati­ves, on the other hand, consider exercise of such control over social media as smacking of cancel culture or unconstitu­tional violation of free speech.

It used to be that Americans agreed with the statement that “I disagree completely with what he/she says, but I will defend absolutely his/her right to say it.”

What happened to that bedrock American belief ?

After all, how can democracy work without disagreeme­nt?

Now, I’m sure some wiseacre is thinking, if Jahncke believes so strongly in free speech, why is he complainin­g about media speech about a report with which he disagrees?

Why? Because the report and much of the media coverage is not about ideas or beliefs, but rather it is all about smearing individual­s who supposedly hold certain ideas.

The legal term for “smearing” is libel. Libel is illegal. No one has the right to libel someone. Fortunatel­y, in this country, proving libel is very difficult. That’s how much Americans believe in free speech. Or once did.

Yet the IREHR and its media enablers are engaging essentiall­y in libel. Add that to the charge of guilt by associatio­n, as to which it should be said that no American judge would allow charges of guilt by associatio­n to be uttered in a courtroom.

Let’s just dip a toe into the IREHR waters to gauge just how hysterical and unserious its report is. Groups advocating keeping schools open or re-opening schools are evidently considered COVID denier groups and included among the “789 farright groups.” PUHlease!

I would be proud to be a member of the openschool­s groups. I just haven’t taken the time to join. I have advocated for open schools from the beginning of the pandemic. I consider myself extremely fortunate that my youngster has attended in-person public-school kindergart­en and first grade almost every day over the last two school years.

I will conclude by saying that I will remain willfully ignorant of the substance and the details of the IREHR report. It is a document not worthy of even a glance. The 16 Republican­s fingered by IREHR should wear its attack as a red badge of courage.

 ?? Michael Osbun ??
Michael Osbun

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States