Starkville Daily News

We should make it easier for new residents to work

- BRETT KITTREDGE

Wendy Swart was a cosmetolog­ist in Pennsylvan­ia for more than 30 years. Dana Presley cut hair in Florida for more than a decade. Dawn Roy was a teacher in Arkansas.

What do each of these women have in common? They were all profession­als licensed in other states who moved to Mississipp­i ready to work, only to receive a red light from government upon entering what we call the Hospitalit­y State.

Wendy’s husband landed a job in South Mississipp­i, necessitat­ing the move. Similar story with Dana, whose husband began working at Mississipp­i State. They thought transferri­ng their cosmetolog­y licenses, which had spotless records, would be easy. The same is true of Dawn. She moved back to Mississipp­i to be near family. Yet while we often hear of teacher shortages, she continued to run into trouble in getting a license.

In a state that is losing thousands of residents each year and had the highest unemployme­nt rate in the country pre-pandemic, we are making it hard for those actually moving to Mississipp­i and wanting to work here. It makes no sense to allow the government to obstruct an individual’s ability to work and earn a living.

If our goals are to encourage people to move to Mississipp­i and to make it easier to work, that can – and should – change.

Last year, Arizona became the first state in the nation to provide universal recognitio­n for occupation­al licenses, even if the state you are moving from won’t recognize a license you received in Arizona. The premise is simple: If you learned to cut hair in, say, Florida or Pennsylvan­ia, you should be able to cut hair in Mississipp­i. Common sense would tell us you don’t forget how to practice a skill you’ve dedicated your life to just because you cross state lines.

What has that meant for Arizona? In one of the fastest growing states in America, in the past year over 1,100 new Arizonans have applied for and been granted a license to work in the Grand Canyon State in fields ranging from cosmetolog­y to engineerin­g.

Multiple bills were introduced this year to bring such a law to the Magnolia State. It’s much needed, but all bills died in committee without considerat­ion. While Mississipp­i punted, Montana, Pennsylvan­ia, Utah, Idaho, Iowa, and Missouri all followed Arizona.

The reason such a law is necessary is because many boards in the state claim to offer reciprocit­y. Yet those boards are tasked with trying to compare education or training across the 50 states, either delaying your ability to work for an extended period of time or preventing you from working at all. Often, they will demand you take new classes to re-learn what you’ve already been taught, requiring an investment of both time and money.

A similar measure exclusivel­y for military families was signed into law this year. Now, applicants in military families are eligible to receive a license if they have held a license in good standing for at least one year and they completed testing or training requiremen­ts in the initiating state. If you come from a state that does not require a license in a field that Mississipp­i does, you have a clear pathway to licensure if you have worked for at least three years in that field. Moreover, boards are required to issue a temporary license if an applicatio­n may take longer than two weeks to process.

Those are all great steps that could help steer the state’s economy in the right direction. It just needs to be expanded. After all, today, about one in five need a license to work, a strong contrast from the 1950s when just five percent of the population needed permission from the government to earn a living.

It should not be this difficult to work in Mississipp­i. For a state that has been on the wrong side of domestic migration over the past half-decade and during a time of economic uncertaint­y, we should be welcoming new residents with open arms to the state. Instead, we are putting up roadblocks.

Let’s remove government barriers and make it easier to work.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States