New rules for trains hauling oil include slower speeds
After spate of highprofile accidents, the railroad industry agreed with government regulators Friday to reduce speeds on trains carrying crude, conduct more frequent track inspections and improve braking by July.
The measures come on top of an effort by the Department of Transportation to upgrade tank car safety and an emergency order last year to tighten operating procedures on trains that can haul about 100 tank cars at a time across long stretches.
The response comes after several major North American crashes of oil trains that set off fires and explosions, the worst killing 47 people in the Canadian townof Lac- Megantic, Quebec, last summer.
Since then, crashes have occurred in Alabama; North Dakota; Alberta, Canada; and Pennsylvania.
Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx signed the agreement with the Association of American Railroads, laying out eight measures intended to raise “the safety bar.”
“Safety is our top priority, and we have a shared responsibility to make sure crude oil is transported safely from origin to destination,” Foxx said in a statement.
“Today’s changes will enhance safety while we continue to pursue our comprehensive approach focused on prevention, mitigation and emergency response through collaboration with our partners,” Foxx said in a statement.
The most significant actionwould reduce themaximum speed of crude trains from 50 mph to 40 mph in “high- threat urban areas.” That could have nationwide ramifications on the speeds of other freight, because trains’ movements are highly coordinated to maximize the use of track.
“It will impact velocity across the network,” railroad association President EdwardHamberger said in an interview. “It stretches resources a little bit.”
Hamberger agreed with outside expertswhosay the railroadindustry has gotten a “bad rap” on carrying crude, but said the measures should further improve safety and address “a risk of having a loss of confidence in the communities wherewe operate.”
BNSF Railway is still cleaning up the mess in Casselton, N. D., where a train with more than 100 tank cars struck another derailed train in December and caused an explosion that required the evacuation of much of the town.
Hamberger acknowledged that a “natural tension” has developed between shippers of crude and the railroad industry. “I have heard more than once if you would just keep the train on the tracks, we wouldn’t have a problem.”
In the rail industry’s view the crude represents a higher- risk product and therefore should be a shared responsibility.
“What I am trying to get away from is our industry pointing the finger,” he said. And shippers do have a legitimate point that the accidents have not been their fault, added Brigham McCown, former head of the Pipeline and HazardousMaterial SafetyAdministration. “If an Amtrak derails, do you blame the passengers?” he said.
The association was the lead on making the agreement with the Transportation Department, but all seven major railroads that are members individually approved the deal.
McCown said the new safety measures could raise the costs of shipping oil by rail enough to make it less competitive. Oil produced in the North Dakota Bakken field can be shipped by pipeline for $ 5 per barrel, while rail costs $ 12 to $ 15 per barrel, even before the latest measures, he said.