Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

U.N. approves new sanctions on N. Korea

Penalties fall short of those U.S. sought after weapons tests

- By Tracy Wilkinson Washington Bureau tracy.wilkinson@latimes.com

WASHINGTON — The U.N. Security Council unanimousl­y approved a resolution to impose new economic sanctions on North Korea for its nuclear weapons buildup, but the proposed penalties were weaker than the Trump administra­tion had sought.

The 15-0 vote marks the second unanimous decision against North Korea in the weeks since it unexpected­ly tested interconti­nental ballistic missiles and an apparent hydrogen bomb.

After late-night negotiatio­ns Sunday with China, the U.S. delegation broadly weakened a sanctions proposal that Beijing was unwilling to support. China’s cooperatio­n is key to enforcing any sanctions.

The move shows the continued division among major world powers as they grapple with a government that has repeatedly defied U.N. resolution­s.

Nonetheles­s, U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley told the council after the vote that “these are by far the strongest measures ever imposed on North Korea.” But she stressed that “these steps only work if all nations implement them completely and aggressive­ly.”

The initial U.S. resolution had included a ban on oil exports to North Korea, which would have severely crippled the isolated nation’s economy, and a freeze on the personal assets of its leader, Kim Jong Un.

But as China and Russia made their opposition known, U.S. diplomats backed down, agreeing to gradually reduce, instead of ban, oil exports to Pyongyang.

Exports of refined oil to North Korea will be cut in about half, to 2 million barrels annually, according to a U.S. diplomat involved in the talks.

The proposed freeze of Kim’s assets abroad was dropped altogether.

“It’s a negotiatio­n,” the U.S. official said. “That’s where we landed.”

The official, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity, in keeping with State Department practices, said it was unlikely the North Korean leader had bank accounts, properties or other assets hidden overseas that could be seized.

The United States also stepped away from insisting that the U.N. authorize use of military force to interdict North Korean vessels at sea that are suspected of smuggling banned components for its nuclear or ballistic missile programs.

The U.S. side also backed off its proposal to require all countries to expel North Korean guest workers. Tens of thousands of North Koreans work in Asia and the Middle East and send most of their earnings to the government in Pyongyang, a major source of the country’s foreign exchange.

The new resolution calls for firing 93,000 North Korean workers employed overseas when their contracts expire.

A U.N. ban on the export of North Korean textiles, one of the country’s fastestgro­wing industries, stayed in the resolution. Textile exports netted $726 million last year for Pyongyang.

Combined with previous sanctions, the official said, 90 percent of North Korea’s declared exports, including seafood, coal and textiles, will be embargoed. He said he was confident that China and Russia were on board with the resolution, which he characteri­zed as a “major step in increased pressure.”

In August, the Security Council unanimousl­y approved a resolution to impose sanctions intended to cut annual North Korean export income by a third, or $1 billion. It is not clear how much of that has been realized and how much of the current measure replicates some of those cuts.

So far, sanctions have done little to slow North Korea’s relentless progress in developing nuclear arms. The Trump administra­tion has repeatedly called on China, North Korea’s main trading partner and political ally, to put more pressure on Kim to refrain from further testing of nuclear and ballistic missiles. Beijing’s willingnes­s to do so has been spotty, and even when it has called on North Korea to stand down, Kim has gone ahead with missile tests.

The United States and China “have two fundamenta­lly different purposes,” said Joseph Cirincione, president of the Ploughshar­es Fund, a San Francisco-based organizati­on that promotes nuclear nonprolife­ration. “The United States is looking for some sort of sanctions that will bring North Korea to its knees,” he said. “China does not want North Korea to collapse, but wants a stick to get it to the negotiatin­g table. But the U.S. doesn’t want to go to the negotiatin­g table.”

In July, after Pyongyang warned it might fire missiles toward Guam, President Donald Trump threatened to rain “fire and fury” on North Korea.

Pyongyang issued a threat Monday before the U.N. vote. The United States is attempting to “strangle and completely suffocate” North Korea, the country’s Foreign Ministry said, and Pyongyang “shall make absolutely sure that the U.S. pays due price.”

Associated Press contribute­d.

 ?? DREW ANGERER/GETTY ?? Nikki Haley, U.S. ambassador to the U.N., speaks at Monday’s Security Council meeting.
DREW ANGERER/GETTY Nikki Haley, U.S. ambassador to the U.N., speaks at Monday’s Security Council meeting.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States