Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

Prepare for next attack on the Ag Reserve

- Randy Schultz

For the third time in six months, a proposal to undermine the will of Palm Beach County voters has been withdrawn, supposedly for further review.

But this isn’t the National Football League. Nothing will reverse the opinion that these three projects would undercut a massive public investment in a unique place.

The Agricultur­al Reserve Area is 20,000 acres between Clint Moore and Hypoluxo roads west of the Florida Turnpike. This coastal farm region supports jobs, supplies farm-to-table restaurant­s and prevents suburban sprawl from devouring all of South Florida.

Eighteen years ago, Palm Beach County voters taxed themselves $100 million to buy 2,400 acres in the reserve to keep developmen­t away from the farms. The second part of the effort involved restrictio­ns on developmen­t.

Developers, however, they have pushed for two decades to weaken restrictio­ns. GL Homes is the major developer in and around the Agricultur­al Reserve Area. Last week, the company pulled — for now — its idea for destroying the reserve to save it.

In May, GL proposed a swap. GL would get to build nearly 2,500 homes in the reserve that it could not build under current rules. In exchange, the company would build only about 40 percent of the homes the county commission had allowed GL to build northwest of the reserve in a project called Indian Trails Grove. The public would get 3,000 acres of preserve. Such a deal.

GL solicited friendly op-ed articles and cozied up to residents near Indian Trails Grove. They secured support from County Commission­er Melissa McKinlay, whose district would include Indian Trails Grove. She faces re-election next year and could tell constituen­ts that she got them 2,500 fewer homes.

And in August, the school board approved an agreement under which GL would donate land for an elementary school and a high school west of Boynton Beach — where the new homes would go. The company also promised $10 million for school constructi­on. All of it, of course, depended on the county commission approving the GL swap.

But county planners ignored the promotiona­l campaign. They noted that the extra homes would “alter the fundamenta­l policy concepts to preserve agricultur­e in the Agricultur­al Reserve.” That land for schools would break a precedent against such “institutio­nal” uses west of State Road 7 — the line in the sand against sprawl.

This swap, the planners said, would come as the reserve is “approachin­g fulfillmen­t” of the master plan. What the voters wanted is working. So the staff recommende­d that the planning commission, an advisory board, deny the applicatio­n at last Friday’s meeting. A Sun Sentinel editorial advocated denial. So GL Homes pulled the proposal to discuss the “merits and community benefits” of the swap.

The same thing happened in July, when a developer proposed putting workforce housing in the reserve. The staff said the project would allow new “densities and intensitie­s” in the reserve and recommende­d denial.

It happened in October, when a developer wanted to build a 223-bed senior living facility on the southeast corner of the reserve. The rules allow 30 beds. Staff recommende­d denial. The more you look, the worse these projects get. That’s especially true for the GL swap.

Before the commission changed the rules for Indian Trails Grove, GL could have built fewer than 400 homes on the site. So at 1,477 homes after donating the land for preservati­on, GL still would come out ahead. And that generosity toward the school district? The schools would make GL’s new homes more valuable.

County commission­ers who have voted to weaken developmen­t rules in the Agricultur­al Reserve claim they aren’t voting to develop land the public bought. But Lisa Interlandi of the Everglades Law Center responds that the overall plan included the public land and the developmen­t restrictio­ns. “If you eliminate either,” Interlandi said, “the entire plan will be undermined.”

Commission­er Mary Lou Berger represents the reserve. The Coalition of Boynton West Residentia­l Associatio­ns opposes the GL swap. But Berger is term-limited. She inherited the seat from her former boss, Burt Aaronson. He represente­d District 5 for 20 years and now is a lobbyist for GL Homes.

Almost no one favors these three proposals but the developers. How about this? Any commission­er who supports them must repay the public’s $100 million. We can work out some friendly terms.

Email Randy Schultz: randy@bocamag.com

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States