Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

Outlawed redlining still hinders many homebuyers

Analysis: People of color denied mortgage loans at higher rates

- By Aaron Glantz and Emmanuel Martinenz Reveal HOUSING, 8B

PHILADELPH­IA — Fifty years after the federal Fair Housing Act banned racial discrimina­tion in lending, African-Americans and Latinos continue to be routinely denied convention­al mortgage loans at rates far higher than their white counterpar­ts.

This modern-day redlining persisted in 61 metro areas even when controllin­g for applicants’ income, loan amount and neighborho­od, according to millions of Home Mortgage Disclosure Act records analyzed by Reveal from The Center for Investigat­ive Reporting.

The yearlong analysis, based on 31 million records, relied on techniques used by leading academics, the Federal Reserve and Department of Justice to identify lending disparitie­s.

It found a pattern of troubling denials for people of color across the country, including in major metropolit­an areas such as Atlanta, Detroit, Philadelph­ia, St. Louis and San Antonio.

African-Americans faced the most resistance in Southern cities — Mobile, Ala.; Greenville, N.C.; and Gainesvill­e— and Latinos in Iowa City, Iowa.

No matter their location, loan applicants told similar stories, describing an uphill battle with loan officers who they said seemed to be fishing for a reason to say no.

“I had a fair amount of savings and still had so much trouble just left and right,” said Rachelle Faroul, a 33-year-old black woman who was rejected twice by lenders when she tried to buy a brick row house close to Malcolm X Park in Philadelph­ia, where AfricanAme­ricans were 2.7 times as likely as whites to be denied a convention­al mortgage.

In the 1930s, surveyors with the federal Home Owners’ Loan Corp. drew lines on maps and colored some neighborho­ods red, deeming them “hazardous” for bank lending because of the presence of AfricanAme­ricans or European immigrants, especially Jews.

Redlining has been outlawed for half a century. And for the last 40 years, banks have had a legal obligation under the Community Reinvestme­nt Act to solicit clients — borrowers and depositors — from all segments of their communitie­s.

But in many places, Reveal found the law hasn’t made much difference.

The analysis — independen­tly reviewed and confirmed by The Associated Press — showed black applicants were turned away at significan­tly higher rates than whites in 48 cities, Latinos in 25, Asians in nine and Native Americans in three.

In Washington, D.C., Reveal found all four groups were significan­tly more likely to be denied a home loan than whites.

“It’s not acceptable from the standpoint of what we want as a nation: to make sure that everyone shares in economic prosperity,” said Thomas Curry, who served as America’s top bank regulator, the comptrolle­r of the currency, from 2012 until he stepped down in May.

Yet Curry’s agency was part of the problem, deeming 99 percent of banks satisfacto­ry or outstandin­g based on inspection­s administer­ed under the Community Reinvestme­nt Act.

And the Justice Department sued just nine financial institutio­ns

 ?? JOHN BAZEMORE/AP ?? The homeowners­hip gap between whites and African-Americans reportedly is wider than it was in the Jim Crow era.
JOHN BAZEMORE/AP The homeowners­hip gap between whites and African-Americans reportedly is wider than it was in the Jim Crow era.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States