Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

As millennial­s procreate, gender-neutral names proliferat­e

- By Leanne Italie Associated Press

NEW YORK — Whether Royal, Charlie or Salem, Skyler, Justice or Oakley, unisex names for babies are on the rise among parents more willing than ever to embrace the possibilit­y of gender fluidity in their children and attempt to head off sexism on their behalf.

“We’re definitely seeing more conversati­on today around the distinctio­n of a truly gender-neutral name,” said Linda Murray, global editor-in-chief of BabyCenter.com. “This generation is truly interested in genderneut­ral names.”

The Social Security Administra­tion puts out a top 10 list of popular baby names every year based on its registrati­ons, but it also keeps track of names on the rise in its top 1,000.

Name-watchers said crossovers and more neutral names haven’t overtaken the top spots but are more heavily represente­d in the broader ranking, especially among millennial parents.

Pop culture and honoring family or religious history are important in baby naming, as is the cool factor.

But more names are being used for either sex regardless of which gender they were originally associated with, and neutral naming has become a flash point for debate.

“We chose a gender-neutral name, Riley, for my daughter,” said Lori Kinkler, a psychologi­st in San Antonio, Texas. “We knew her sex, but gender is fluid and yet to be determined. Of all the difficulti­es faced by those who live beyond, or across, the binary, we didn’t want name-changing to be one of them. I like that she feels she has options and knows she’ll be accepted by us no matter what.” Riley is 3. Pamela Redmond Satran, co-writer of “The Baby Name Bible” and “Cool Names for Babies,” blogs about baby-naming and is also co-founder of the baby name site Nameberry.com, which crunches about 50,000 names every which way.

Satran said the interest in embracing potential gender fluidity is “an important reason, but it’s not the only reason. In fact, a lot of people choose unisex names because they think they’re cool or they’re meaningful to themselves but they raise their kids in a very gender-specific way.”

Millennial­s aren’t the only ones to give their kids gender-neutral names.

Kyle Good grew up in the 1950s, the middle of five children and the only sibling with a gender-crossing name, based on a performer her father liked.

“My partner is named Jerry, for Gerald, so when we get introduced as ‘Kyle and Jerry’ most people think I’m Jerry and he’s Kyle,” she said.

Satran said some gender neutral-names follow other trends, such as choosing traditiona­l last names as first names (hello, Madison) or bits of geography and nature: Lake, Blue, Dakota.

And spellings have long signaled gender in names that sound the same: Yves vs. Eve.

In a few countries, unisex names are forbidden by law: Portugal, Denmark and Iceland.

Local registrars decide in Germany if an unusual name would negatively affect a child.

Sorry, Harper, but it’s unclear where those rules would leave you.

Harper is the 10th most popular female name in the Social Security Administra­tion’s 2016 rankings, the latest available. It ranked 793 among boys that year.

“We named our baby Avery Morgann. The intention was to give them more room to define themselves as they get older. Also, name changes are expensive and frustratin­g,” said parent C.J. Alicandro, of Portland, Ore., who strives for gender neutrality in all ways for the 21⁄2-year-old.

“We wanted to set up Avery with an opportunit­y to not be limited as much as possible by a name and be able to choose an identity as much as possible, given the confines that are forced upon them,” said Alicandro, 31, a social worker.

Rebecca Connolly, 29, in the western New York town of Castile, said she and her guitar-playing husband chose Lennon Wallace for their 21⁄2-year-old son.

Both she and her husband are fans of late Beatles musician John Lennon — for his music and activism.

“I wouldn’t say I intentiona­lly gave my son a unisex name,” Connolly said. “As a child I felt bad for all the Taylor, Jordan and Jamies I knew whose names didn’t identify their sex. By the time I was having kids, 50 percent of the little girls I met were named Riley, Avery, Logan, etc. And I realized all softsoundi­ng boy names are now considered unisex.

“I hate the double standard that giving a girl a boy name is spunky and strong but giving your boy a name used by girls will get him bullied and called a sissy at school,” she said.

Connolly also has a daughter, Lucille Beatrice, and is pregnant second son.

The current front-runner name for him is considered masculine, she said, declining to reveal it, “though with the boy name on girls trend going strong, maybe it’ll be considered unisex by the time he’s in school.” That’s fine with her. “I plan to teach them there is nothing inferior about women so sharing a name with them is not a big deal. Being called a girl is not an insult.” with

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States