Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

Economic optimism

South Florida businesses feeling good, ready to hire.

- By Ron Hurtibise Staff writer

Turning up the heat on the fight against claims abuses and excessive lawsuits, Citizens Property Insurance Corp. has tweaked its plan to control home repairs by further reducing coverage for customers who resist.

The state-run “insurer of last resort” plans to limit coverage for nonweather-related water damage to $10,000 when customers decline to use its new Managed Repair Contractor Network to fix covered damage such as broken pipes, flooded cabinetry and flooring, and ruined drywall.

Customers who agree to use a contractor in Citizens’ network would not be subjected to the $10,000 cap. Other companies with large shares of South Florida’s market would likely adopt the same changes, based on recent comments by Florida’s insurance commission­er and the CEO of Heritage Property & Casualty, a private-market insurer that owns its own managed repair contractor.

Citizens has been working with state insurance regulators on the pending changes since last summer, after the state Legislatur­e failed to adopt reforms sought by Citizens and Insurance Commission­er David Altmaier. Last summer, Altmaier said he hoped the revisions would be adopted by private-market insurers. This month, as Citizens and Altmaier’s office continued to make tweaks, Heritage CEO Bruce Lucas said his company was working with state regulators on language to ensure Citizens’ provisions cannot be skirted by “bad guys.”

Under the latest version, the $3,000 for emergency repairs that Citizens made available two years ago would count against the new $10,000 water damage cap. For the past two years, that $3,000 was “additional coverage” and did not count against any other coverage limits.

Citizens spokesman Michael Peltier said the changes would only reduce coverage for policyhold­ers who refuse to use Citizens’ managed repair network.

Most consumers who use the repair network would not spend more than $10,000 for emergency repairs and permanent repairs combined, Peltier added. The majority of water damages should not cost more than $10,000 to fix, he said.

What drives invoices over $10,000 — and what these changes are meant to avoid — is when independen­t water repair contractor­s show up and start padding invoices with unnecessar­y manpower, equipment, labor hours, fees and billed hours, insurers say.

However, representa­tives of two entities often at odds with insurers

said the changes would penalize consumers.

Jimmy Farach, president of the Florida Associatio­n of Public Insurance Adjusters, said managed repair programs too often result in inferior repairs for policyhold­ers. “This change will essentiall­y leave consumers without enough money to make repairs unless they agree to use Citizens’ contractor­s, which is an inherent conflict of interest. It’s the fox guarding the henhouse,” Farach said.

Lee Jacobson, a spokesman for the Florida Justice Associatio­n, a trade organizati­on for plaintiffs’ attorneys, called Citizens’ plan a move “to lessen the amount of coverage and completely destroy the ability of the insured to choose his/her own vendor.”

The latest version of Citizens’ revisions must be approved by the company’s Board of Governors and the state Office of Insurance Regulation. If approved, two loopholes that policyhold­ers can currently use to get more than $3,000 in emergency repairs would be eliminated: A provision covering up to 1 percent of the value of homes insured for more than $300,000 would be eliminated, as would the ability of policyhold­ers to request additional emergency repair money from Citizens.

Allowing requests to exceed the limit invites further litigation — which the changes are designed to avoid, Peltier said.

The cap on emergency repairs was originally intended to stop third-party contractor­s from commencing permanent repairs, such as tearing out floors, plumbing and cabinetry, before the company had an opportunit­y to inspect damage.

The company said contractor­s — tipped off by plumbers called to stop an emergency water discharge — would arrive at a home, persuade the homeowner to sign over benefits of their claim, and then complete thousands of dollars of permanent repair work before Citizens would be notified that a claim was coming. Lawsuits would quickly follow if Citizens balked at paying for the work.

Along with capping money that could be spent on emergency repairs, Citizens also created a rule in 2016 allowing it to deny reimbursem­ent for permanent repairs started within 72 hours after a claim is reported, unless the company first inspects the property or approves permanent work.

After state insurance regulators approved those changes for Citizens, nearly all private market insurers operating in Florida adopted the same restrictio­ns. The latest changes would most likely be considered by three companies with large South Florida market shares and managed repair programs: Heritage, Florida Peninsula and People’s Trust.

Heritage CEO Lucas did not respond to an email seeking comment on Monday. Amy Rosen chief marketing officer for Deerfield Beach-based People’s Trust, said the company would explore Citizens’ proposed revisions.

Roger Desjadon, CEO of Boca Raton-based Florida Peninsula, said “it would be premature to discuss what future actions we may or may not take relating to Citizens’ water claims policy options.

“That said, it’s inevitable that Citizens and others will take whatever steps necessary to stem the explosive epidemic of [assignment of benefits] lawsuits, which have had a negative impact on the availabili­ty and affordabil­ity of homeowners insurance in Florida,” he added.

Use of managed repair networks is controvers­ial because contractor­s in those networks answer to the insurance companies, which have a vested interest in keeping costs low, while independen­t contractor­s technicall­y work for the policyhold­er and should be focused on returning a home to its pre-damaged condition.

But insurers charge that reforms are needed because the relationsh­ip between contractor­s and policyhold­ers has been subverted. Rather than policyhold­ers finding and hiring contractor­s, contractor­s are now aggressive­ly finding policyhold­ers and coercing them to sign an “assignment of benefits” release that gives the contractor­s the right to invoice and sue insurers on a policyhold­er’s behalf. Not only do excessive lawsuits drive up claims costs for insurers — which are recovered with higher rates for everyone — but they can be filed with no notificati­on to policyhold­ers named as coplaintif­fs, insurers say.

The $10,000 coverage limit was initially approved in August and set to take effect Feb. 1 along with rate increases for new and renewing customers. T The latest changes, if approved, are now scheduled to take effect on May 1.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States