Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

White House plans new rule on abortion

Funding would be tied to restrictio­ns on the procedure

- By Noam N. Levey noam.levey@latimes.com

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion moved Friday to place new restrictio­ns on access to abortion, as the Health and Human Services Department prepared new regulation­s that would effectivel­y bar organizati­ons that receive federal family planning money from providing abortions or counseling women about how to get the procedure.

The proposal — which has not yet been officially issued as a rule — would expand limits on what activities organizati­ons such as Planned Parenthood can provide. It certainly will set off a new legal battle over abortion services.

According to the White House, the proposal would require recipients of Title X family planning funds to establish a “bright line of physical as well as financial separation” between federally funded family planning services and any programs where abortion services are performed or discussed.

The administra­tion argues this is not a “gag rule” that would prohibit discussion­s of abortion services.

But the proposal would expand long-standing restrictio­ns on the use of federal funds. Abortion providers now must ensure that no federal money is used to pay for the procedure.

Many family planning advocates think that the new rule, if implemente­d, would make it impossible for many clinicians to talk freely with pregnant women about their options.

“This ‘gag rule’ is not only unconscion­able, but it undermines medical ethics by forcing health care profession­als to withhold accurate and timely medical informatio­n from patients,” said Dr. Jenn Conti, a fellow with Physicians for Reproducti­ve Health.

Abortion opponents have lobbied hard for new restrictio­ns, pushing the Trump administra­tion to extend the new limits on federal funding.

A host of anti-abortion rights groups cheered the White House moves Friday.

“This is a major victory which will energize the grass-roots as we head into the critical midterm elections,” said Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfels­er.

Trump, whose past pronouncem­ents in support of abortion rights once made social conservati­ves nervous, is scheduled to speak at the Susan B. Anthony List’s annual gala Tuesday.

The White House cast the proposal as the latest in the administra­tion’s moves to fulfill Trump’s campaign promise to restrict access to abortion services.

The Trump administra­tion has supported provisions in GOP bills to roll back the Affordable Care Act to cut off funding to Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest provider of abortion services. Those bills failed as the GOP campaign to repeal the 2010 health care law collapsed.

But anti-abortion rights groups have kept up their campaign to squeeze off government funding for Planned Parenthood and other organizati­ons that provide abortion services.

In the crosshairs has been Title X, the nation’s first federal program dedicated to supporting family planning services, such as contracept­ion and counseling. Since 1970, the Title X program has funded thousands of clinics and other medical providers.

The money has never been used to pay for abortions. But because some recipients of Title X funding also provided abortion services, Title X has long been a target of conservati­ves.

In the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan’s administra­tion proposed regulation­s to bar clinicians at any organizati­on receiving Title X funding from providing abortion counseling or referral, even when requested by a pregnant woman.

This so-called “domestic gag rule” was challenged in court and upheld by the Supreme Court, but by then, President Bill Clinton was in office, and he stopped implementa­tion of the rule. It was never reinstated.

The new proposal from the Trump administra­tion would not explicitly prohibit organizati­ons that receive Title X money from counseling women about abortion services, according to the White House.

But it would change the long-standing requiremen­t that family planning counseling include a discussion about the full range of options available to women, including abortion.

And it would prevent Title X recipients from referring women who want abortions to providers that offer these services.

That would mark a major step backward, said Kinsey Hasstedt, senior policy manager at the Guttmacher Institute, a nonprofit that studies family planning and abortion.

“Title X is based around the concept of patient-centered care,” she said. “It requires that all pregnant patients receive counseling on and referral for the full range of pregnancy options.”

Hasstedt and others also say the proposed rule could make it impossible for groups such as Planned Parenthood to get Title X funding.

 ?? JUSTIN LANE/EPA ?? The Trump administra­tion’s proposed rule would bar organizati­ons that receive federal family planning money from providing abortions or counseling how to get the procedure.
JUSTIN LANE/EPA The Trump administra­tion’s proposed rule would bar organizati­ons that receive federal family planning money from providing abortions or counseling how to get the procedure.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States