EU aims to give refugees more aid

100 more reported missing or dead at sea after boat fails

BRUSSELS — European Union leaders Friday drew up new plans to screen migrants in North Africa for eligibility to enter Europe, saying they set aside major differences over stemming the flow of people seeking sanctuary or better lives.

But the showof unity did little to hide that the hardestwork still lies ahead.

Even as the leaders met in Brussels for a second day, Libya’s coast guard said about 100 people were missing and feared dead after their boat capsized in theMediterranean.

The leaders agreed on a “new approach” to manage those rescued at sea, just as bickering over who should take responsibility for them undermines unity and threatens cross-border business and travel in Europe. Italy, Greece and Spain bear responsibility for accepting most of the migrants and have felt abandoned by their EU partners.

Italy, with a new antiEuropean government, has refused to take charge of people rescued at sea in recent weeks, sparking a diplomatic row with France andMalta.

In Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel’s coalition partner is demanding she take a tougher line on migrants, undermining her leadership.

The new plan is to receive people from rescue ships in EU nations that agree to share responsibility for handing migration with the EU’s main pointofcountries like Spain, Italy and Greece. But they also will receive them in centers in North Africa and possibly the Balkans.

“A complete approach was adopted,” French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters after a night of haggling and delays to address demands from Italy that its views be incorporated in the final summit statement.

“We are protecting better. We are cooperating more. And we are reaffirming our principles. All hastily made solutions, be they solely national ones or a betrayal of our values that consists in pushing people off to third countries, were clearly set aside,” Macron said.

Even new Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, whose populist government has rocked the EU’s political landscape, said: “On the whole, we can say we are satisfied.”

That said, the Czech Republic and Austria have no intention of basing migrant centers on their territory.

“Why should there be centers? Center should be outside of Europe. Ellis Island, yes? And the Australian model, very simple. We have to execute this,” Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis said.

The “disembarkation platforms” are a logical extension of the EU’s migrant deal withTurkey. The government in Ankara was paid more than 3 billion euros in refugee aid to stop people leaving for the Greek islands. The bottom line is that numbers have dropped by about 96 percent, compared with 2015 when well over 1 million people entered Europe, most of them fleeing conflict in Syria and Iraq.

Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Niger and Tunisia are touted as possible locations, eventhough details of the plans are sketchy. Morocco already has refused and none of those listed has volunteered to take part.

The EU’s executive Commission now must draft something more concrete in coordination with the U.N.’s refugee agency and the International Organization for Migration, which would prefer to operate in European migration centers only.

Libya is a major transit point to Europe for those fleeing poverty and violence in Africa and the Middle East. Traffickers have exploited Libya’s chaos following the 2011 uprising that toppled and later killed dictator Moammar Gadhafi.

Howmuchthe plans will cost remains a mystery, but itwon’t be cheap.

The UNHCR cautiously welcomed the plan but warned that it must be fleshed out and that African involvement via the African Union regional bloc is “indispensable.”

IOM spokesman Leonard Doyle said his agency was “very pleased at the solidarity and consensus” that emerged in Brussels.