Judge wants special monitor
Young immigrants to get independent well-being look-see
SAN DIEGO — A federal judge in Los Angeles said Friday that she will appoint an independent monitor to evaluate conditions for immigrant children in U.S border facilities in Texas following a spate of reports of spoiled food, insufficient water and frigid conditions faced by the youngsters and their parents.
Judge Dolly Gee said she reached her decision after seeing a “disconnect” between U.S. government monitors’ assessment of conditions in facilities in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley and the accounts of more than 200 immigrant children and their parents detailing numerous problems.
“It seems like there continue to be persistent problems,” she said during a hearing in a longstanding settlement agreement case focusing on the care of children in government custody. “I need to appoint an independent monitor to give me an objective viewpoint about what is going on at the facilities.”
Gee’s decision came as the Trump administration worked to reunite families separated at the U.S.-Mexico border under a second, separate court mandate out of San Diego. Hundreds remained separated as the government worked to clean up the effects of its policy that prompted global outrage and a presidential order halting separations.
Peter Schey, an attorney
who represents immigrant children detained by the U.S government, said he hopes Gee’s decision will spur U.S border authorities to make improvements to other centers.
He said in court that problems have worsened with children now spending between three and six days in U.S. Customs and Border Protection facilities, where they were previously held between one and three days.
“We’ve seen an intensification with all the chaos the administration has caused,” said Schey, who has long requested an independent monitor.
Sarah Fabian, a Justice Department attorney, opposed the appointment without having an opportunity to respond to the accounts of children and parents collected by immigrant advocates at facilities in June and July.
She said border authorities provide water fountains and jugs in cells and that facility conditions must comply with agency policies.
“We believe we haven’t had a chance for a full evidentiary hearing on this,” Fabian said.
Both sides have until Aug. 10 to agree on a proposed monitor. If they can’t, each will make suggestions to the judge, and she will choose one.
Homeland Security officials earlier Friday said they had reunified all eligible parents with children — but noted many others were not eligible because they had been released
from immigration custody, are in their home countries or chose not to be reunited.
More than 1,800 children 5 years and older had been reunited with parents or sponsors as of Thursday. That included 1,442 children who were returned to parents who were in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody, and another 378 who were released under a variety of other circumstances.
But 700 more remain separated, including 431 whose parents were deported, officials say. Those reunions take more time, effort and paperwork as authorities fly children back to Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras.
Updated figures were not made public, but new data were expected to be released at a Friday hearing in San Diego before the judge overseeing the reunification process.
San Diego federal judge Dana Sabraw, who ordered the reunifications, must decide how to address the hundreds of still-separated children whose parents have been deported, as well as how much time, if any, reunified parents should be allowed to file asylum claims.
He will also consider the American Civil Liberties Union request to give reunified parents at least a week to consider if they wish to seek asylum.
The government opposes the waiting period, and Sabraw has put a hold on deporting reunified families while the issue is decided.