Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

Mattis: Border deployment ‘great training’

- By Paul Sonne

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Jim Mattis described the deployment to the border as “great training” and told active-duty soldiers in Texas not to pay attention to the news coverage of the operation because they would “go nuts.”

Mattis and Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen visited troops near the U.S.-Mexico border on Wednesday, a little over two weeks after President Donald Trump dispatched thousands of active-duty forces in anticipati­on of a Central American migrant caravan.

Critics assailed Trump for sending such a large contingent of troops to the border ahead of the midterm elections, accusing him of mounting an unnecessar­y stunt designed to fire up anti-immigratio­n sentiment among his political base.

But Mattis has defended the operation to support U.S. Customs and Border Protection, saying the American military “doesn’t do stunts.” His trip on Wednes-

day amounted to a publicrela­tions foray designed to present the operation as legal and nothing out of the ordinary — a necessary measure to back up border agents faced with an influx of migrants.

During the flight to Texas, Mattis described the operation as a “moral and ethical mission to support our border patrolmen” and cited previous military operations on the border, dating back to President Woodrow Wilson’s deployment of the Army there to counteract Mexican revolution­ary Pancho Villa’s forces.

“We determined that the mission was absolutely legal, and this was also reviewed by Department of Justice lawyers,” Mattis said on the plane. “It’s obviously a moral and ethical mission to support our border patrolmen. There’s nothing new under the sun.”

The National Guard deployed to the border during the administra­tions of George W. Bush and Barack Obama to aid Border Patrol, but active-duty forces haven’t deployed there since counternar­cotics missions decades ago.

After arriving at Base Camp Donna, Mattis met with soldiers who have been setting up barbed wire fences to “harden” points of entry in anticipati­on of migrants arriving from caravans headed northward.

The defense secretary suggested the soldiers should disregard the controvers­y surroundin­g the mission that has surfaced in the news media.

“There’s all sorts of stuff in the news, and that sort of thing,” Mattis told a group of soldiers. “You just concentrat­e on what your company commander, your battalion commander, tells you. Because if you read all that stuff, you know, you’ll go nuts.”

Mattis also sought to present the border deployment as good training for U.S. forces, arguing that the mission would improve their readiness and counteract­ing criticism that Trump was wasting the time and money of the armed forces for political effect.

“What a great training,” Mattis told one of the soldiers in Texas as he walked through the installati­on with Nielsen. “We could not have had a better training event.”

Trump announced ahead of the midterms that he would deploy as many as 10,000 to 15,000 troops in anticipati­on of the caravan’s arrival, actively publicizin­g a muscular military deployment that played well with his base.

On Wednesday, some two weeks later, a spokeswoma­n for U.S. Northern Command said about 5,900 troops were deployed there at this time and significan­t increases weren’t expected.

Northern Command previously had said more than 7,000 active-duty troops would be supporting CBP in California, Arizona and Texas.

The spokeswoma­n for the command said Wednesday that estimate had included troops who were in “preparatio­n for deployment” status. The activeduty forces joined more than 2,000 National Guardsmen who have been deployed to the border since April.

The Pentagon initially dubbed the active-duty operation “Faithful Patriot.” Mattis later ordered the military to scrap the name and describe the mission as border support.

“When the name of the mission first came in, I had given instructio­ns, ‘I do not want to put this mission in some arcane military terms. If what we’re doing is laying wire, don’t talk about implementi­ng a barrier plan,’ ” Mattis said.

He said he wanted the American public to understand what the military is doing and not doing on the border because “this is a highly politicall­y visible issue.”

Mattis said there was still no cost estimate for the mission.

The military deployment to the border, including the cost of National Guard forces that have been there since April, could climb well above $200 million by the end of 2018 and grow significan­tly if the deployment­s continue into next year, according to analyst estimates and Pentagon figures. The cost of the National Guard deployment from April 10 through Sept. 30 amounted to $103 million, according to Pentagon figures.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States