Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

US-China truce leaves big issues for later

- By Paul Wiseman, Dave Kolpack and David Pitt

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump heralded a breakthrou­gh in U.S.-China trade talks, and markets rallied in relief over a de-escalation in tensions between the world’s two biggest economies.

But closer inspection suggests there isn’t much substance, at least not yet, to the temporary truce Trump announced Friday at the White House after the U.S. and China wrapped up their 13th round of trade talks.

Yes, Trump agreed to suspend a tariff hike scheduled for Tuesday on $250 billion worth of Chinese imports. And the president said the Chinese agreed to buy $40 billion to $50 billion in U.S. farm products. President Trump agreed to suspend a tariff hike scheduled for Tuesday on $250 billion worth of Chinese imports.

But nothing’s on paper and details are scarce. China’s state-run media hasn’t mentioned the promise to buy all those soybeans and other agricultur­al products.

And the negotiator­s have delayed dealing with the toughest issues for future talks. Meanwhile, the U.S. is still scheduled to target another $160 billion in Chinese

goods Dec. 15, a move that would extend Trump’s tariffs to virtually everything China ships to the United States.

Friday’s announceme­nt was “a nothing-burger,” said Scott Kennedy, who analyzes China’s economy at the Center for Strategic and Internatio­nal Studies. “I call it the ‘Invisible Deal.’ The only thing that happened Friday was that the U.S. delayed the tariff increase.”

The Trump administra­tion acknowledg­es that work remains to be done on what it calls “phase one” of ongoing talks with China.

“We made substantia­l progress last week in the negotiatio­ns,” Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said Monday on CNBC. “We have a fundamenta­l agreement. It is subject to documentat­ion, and there’s a lot of work to be done on that front.”

Mnuchin said he expected that he and U.S. Trade Representa­tive Robert Lighthizer will meet with China’s lead negotiator, Vice Premier Liu He, before a November AsiaPacifi­c summit in Chile. At that gathering, Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping could officially sign off on a phase one agreement.

“It’s curious that Washington and Beijing have not yet put this ‘deal’ in writing,” said Wendy Cutler, a former U.S. trade negotiator now at the Asia Society Policy Institute. “That suggests that the details may not be worked out yet. If that’s the case, we should expect more bumps in the road in the lead up to a midNovembe­r meeting between Trump and Xi.”

Trump emphasized the agricultur­al purchases he says China has agreed to. If China ultimately buys $40 billion to $50 billion a year, as Mnuchin said, it would mark a significan­t win for American farmers, who have been hit hard by the president’s trade wars.

U.S. farm sales to China have never exceeded $26 billion a year, according to the U.S. Department of Agricultur­e.

China is a major food importer as rising incomes boost its appetite for meat, vegetables and higher-quality grains. The communist government has tried to promote self-sufficienc­y in rice, wheat, dairy and some other commoditie­s. But with 1.4 billion people, it cannot meet its own needs.

Jeff Moon, a former U.S. diplomat and trade official specializi­ng in China who is now president of the China Moon Strategies consultanc­y, noted that Trump had reason to delay Tuesday’s planned tariff increase. Trade hostilitie­s are weighing on the U.S. and world economies. Tariffs have pushed up costs for U.S. manufactur­ers and created uncertaint­y about when and how the trade wars will end.

“The bottom line is that both sides (on Friday) gave themselves permission to do what they wanted to do,” Moon said. “China really needs the food, and Trump doesn’t want to impose the (increase in) tariffs. That’s the bottom line.”

“It’s in the two countries’ interests to dial down the hostilitie­s,” agreed David Dollar, senior fellow at the Brookings Institutio­n and a former official at the World Bank and U.S. Treasury.

 ?? ANDREW HARNIK/AP ??
ANDREW HARNIK/AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States