Lack of tear gas studies raise concerns

Police defend the use of chemicals to control protesters

SALEM, Ore. — On June 2, Justin LaFrancois attended a protest against police violence and racism in downtown Charlotte, North Carolina, where he planned to livestream the event for his alternative newspaper’s website.

Shortly into the march, police — who reported that water bottles and rocks were being thrown at them — unleashed a volley of tear gas on the entire crowd, including those marching peacefully. The protesters tried to run. But hemmed in by tall buildings and desperate for an escape route, they tugged at the closed gate of a parking garage, pulling it up just high enough so they could slip inside to escape the pepper balls and exploding flashbang grenades.

“Oh, my God,” LaFrancois said in a video that captured him wheezing hard and coughing from exposure to the gas. “My face is on fire. My eyes are on fire.”

The Charlotte protest was one of the dozens around the country during the past few months where police unleashed tear gas on peaceful protesters. Tear gas has commonly been used as a defensive tool by law enforcement to make rioters disperse.

But during the nationwide Black Lives Matter protests, federal, state and local law enforcement agencies have sometimes been using it offensively, including against peaceful protesters, children, and pregnant women, without providing an escape route or piling on excessive amounts of gas, witnesses and human rights advocates say.

Law enforcement say tear gas, if officials used properly, is an effective for crowd control.

Without it, “the only thing left to do is physical force — shields and batons,” said Deputy Police Chief Jeff Estes of the CharlotteMecklenburg Police Department. Estes said he’s been exposed to tear gas and pepper spray many times.

“I know the effects. I would rather have that than see what we’ve seen in other places where people who are violently assaulting other people have to get hit with sticks and shields,” Estes said.

But interviews by The Associated Press with medical researchers, federal regulatory agencies, and a review of U.S. governmentfunded scientific studies raise questions about the safety of the gas, especially its use on individuals in confined spaces, in excessive tool quantities, and when it’s fired directly at protesters. Medical professionals interviewed said the use of tear gas is particularly concerning during the COVID-19 epidemic.

The AP also found there is no government oversight of the manufacture and use of tear gas. Instead, the industry is left to regulate itself.

“I think this is deeply problematic because there’s no transparency around the manufacture or the sale of these weapons,” said Rohini Haar, an emergency room physician and researcher at the University of California School of Public Health in Berkeley who has published studies on tear gas. “The U.S. has an obligation to protect its citizens. We regulate so many other things. This is an actual chemical weapon.”

Haar said her research tear gas has also been getting stronger over the years. She is particularly concerned about the unknown health effects of silicon that is sometimes added to tear gas to make it last longer in the air and on surfaces.

The AP reached out to the five leading producers of tear gas in the United States. Four never responded to repeated requests for comment. A fifth, the Safariland Group, declined an interview request through a public relations firm but noted the company was divesting Defense Technology, its tear gas maker, to its current managers in the third quarter of this year.

Tear gas was developed around World War I and is banned in warfare by the Chemical Weapons Convention, ratified by almost every country in the world — including the United

States. But it allows chemicals classified as riot control agents, including tear gas, to be used for law enforcement.

Yet provisions of the agreement don’t regulate what counts as a riot-control agent, said Anna Feigenbaum, author of the book “Tear Gas: From the Battlefields of World War I to the Streets of Today.”

“And they ignore or fail to address offensive use of such agents by law enforcement,” Feigenbaum said.

Tear gas works by using a host of chemicals that render individuals unable to function by causing irritation to the eyes, mouth, throat, lungs, and skin.

But despite its widespread use, medical experts say there are few studies on the health effects of tear gas, and many focus on the impact of crowd-control irritants on military personshows nel, a population that tends to be healthier and in better physical condition than the general public.

The U.S. Army even moved to protect its own troops after a study published in 2014 showed that recruits exposed to tear gas in basic training had a nearly 21⁄2-times greater risk of being diagnosed with acute respiratory illness. The Army reacted by lowering concentrations of tear gas and shortening exposure times for the training.

A 2014 study funded by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Defense, and the National Academy of Sciences did try to specify levels of tear gas concentrations that can cause irreversible damage or death.

But Sven Eric Jordt, an associate professor and researcher at Duke University’s School of Medicine, who has long studied tear gas, is critical of the study, saying it recommended levels that should not be exceeded and relied heavily on research that’s at least 50 years old.

Thor Eells, executive director of the nonprofit National Tactical Officers Association, said in a telephone interview the substances are so safe that even if a police department used its entire inventory at one time, no one would be killed or sustain serious injury. Eells has taught tear gas use with a Colorado police department and with Defense Technology.

“An agency will not have enough of the chemical munitions in their current inventory to come even close to being dangerous,” he said.

The American Thoracic Society is calling for a moratorium on tear gas, citing the “the lack of crucial research, the escalation of tear gas use by law enforcement, and the likelihood of compromising lung health and promoting the spread of COVID-19.”