Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

Sites cite crisis in stopping oversight

Thousands bypass environmen­tal rules in pandemic

-

Thousands of oil and gas operations, government facilities and other sites won permission to stop monitoring for hazardous emissions or otherwise bypass rules intended to protect health and the environmen­t because of the coronaviru­s outbreak, The Associated Press has found.

The Trump administra­tion paved the way for the reduced monitoring on March 26 after being pressured by the oil and gas industry, which said lockdowns and social distancing during the pandemic made it difficult to comply with anti-pollution rules. States are responsibl­e for much of the oversight of federal environmen­tal laws, and many followed with leniency policies of their own.

AP’s two-month review found that waivers were granted in more than 3,000 cases, representi­ng the overwhelmi­ng majority of requests citing the outbreak. Hundreds of requests were approved for oil and gas companies. AP reached out to all 50 states citing open-records laws; all but one, New York, provided at least partial informatio­n, reporting the data in differing ways and with varying detail.

Almost all those requesting waivers told regulators they did so to minimize risks for workers and the public during a pandemic — although a handful reported they were trying to cut costs.

The Environmen­tal Protection Agency says the waivers do not authorize recipients to exceed pollution limits. Regulators will continue pursuing those who “did not act responsibl­y under the circumstan­ces,” EPA spokesman James Hewitt said in an email.

But environmen­talists and public health experts say it may be impossible to fully determine the impact of the country’s first extended, national environmen­tal enforcemen­t clemency because monitoring oversight was relaxed.

“The harm from this policy is already done,” said Cynthia Giles, EPA’s former assistant administra­tor under the Obama administra­tion.

EPA has said it will end the COVID-19 enforcemen­t clemency this month.

Refinery giant Marathon Petroleum, already struggling financiall­y before the pandemic, was one of the most aggressive in seeking to dial back its environmen­tal monitoring. On the same day EPA announced its new policy, the Ohio-based company asked Indiana officials for relief from its leak detection, groundwate­r sampling, spill prevention, emissions testing and hazardous waste responsibi­lities at its facilities statewide.

“We believe that by taking these measures, we can do our part to slow the spread of the COVID-19 virus,” Tim Peterkoski, environmen­tal auditing and processes manager for Marathon Petroleum, told the Indiana Department of Environmen­tal Management.

Marathon also pushed for and was granted permission to skip environmen­tal tests at many of its refineries and gas stations in California, Michigan, North Dakota and Texas.

Spokesman Jamal Kheiry said Marathon sought broad regulatory relief early in the pandemic, when it was uncertain how long lockdowns would last or how its operations would be affected. But the company continued emissions monitoring and other activities and usually met deadlines, he said.

Penny Aucoin, a resident of New Mexico’s oil-rich Permian Basin, said since the pandemic, she and her husband have spent days begging regulators to investigat­e surges of noxious gas or hisses that they feared could signal a dangerous leak from one of the many oil and gas companies operating near their home.

“There’s nobody watching,” Aucoin said. “A lot of stuff is going wrong. And there’s nobody to fix it.”

Maddy Hayden, New Mexico’s environmen­tal spokespers­on, said her agency stopped in-person investigat­ions of citizen airquality complaints from March to May to protect staff and the public but stood ready to respond to emergencie­s.

Almost every fielding from industries state reported requests and local government­s to cut back on compliance. Many were for activities like delaying inperson training or submitting records by email rather than paper. Others, however, were requests for temporary exemptions or extensions on monitoring and repairs to stop the flow of harmful soot, toxic compounds, disease-carrying contaminan­ts or heavy metals, AP found.

The findings run counter to statements in late June by Susan Bodine, EPA’s assistant administra­tor for enforcemen­t, who told lawmakers the pandemic was not causing “a significan­t impact on routine compliance, monitoring and reporting” and that industry wasn’t widely seeking relief from monitoring.

Oil and gas companies received a green light to skip dozens of scheduled tests and inspection­s critical for ensuring safe operations, such as temporaril­y halting or delaying tests for leaks or checking on tank seals, flare stacks, emissions monitoring systems or engine performanc­e, which could raise the risk of explosions.

Taken together, the missed inspection­s for leaks could add hundreds or thousands of tons of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, and could make refinery work more dangerous, said Coyne Gibson, a former oil and gas engineer and a member of the Big Bend Conservati­on Alliance in Texas.

“The whole point of leak detection is to avoid people being harmed from a leak of toxic material,” said Victor Flatt, environmen­tal law professor at the University of Houston. “If you suspend leak detection, you don’t even know if it’s happening.”

 ??  ??
 ?? PAUL SANCYA/AP ??
PAUL SANCYA/AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States