Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

Cardio and strength training both benefit metabolism

- Dr. Keith Roach Submit letters to ToYourGood­Health@med.cornell. edu or to 628 Virginia Dr., Orlando, FL 32803.

Dear Dr. Roach: Can you comment on the benefits of weightlift­ing over aerobic exercise? Which is better for losing weight long term? have read that muscle requires more energy metabolica­lly and the more muscle you build, the more fat you will burn. — K.K.

Dear K.K.: There remains debate. However, I can give you the general consensus.

First, the distinctio­n is often not absolute. Weightlift­ing burns calories aerobicall­y; however, many serious weightlift­ers take pains to make sure that their aerobic capacity does not limit their ability to lift by resting in between repetition­s. Similarly, many “aerobic” exercises use elements of resistance..

There are benefits to resistance exercise that even high amounts of pure aerobic exercise cannot achieve. Resistance training has a much larger effect on bone health. Those who do resistance training have lower rates of falls and fractures.

From the standpoint of weight loss, having a larger muscle mass means a greater ability to burn calories. On the other hand, having high cardiovasc­ular fitness from consistent aerobic activity means a greater ability to use oxygen, which correspond­s to metabolism of carbohydra­tes and fats. Longer exercise sessions of at least moderate intensity burn more fat than shorter sessions. It is very difficult to burn large amounts of calories with pure weightlift­ing exercise. It is possible to do resistance training so that you get aerobic benefit as well, by progressin­g from one muscle group to another.

Nearly all elite athletes incorporat­e resistance training, as it improves performanc­e in addition.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States