Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

No sign that Trump declassifi­ed seized documents properly, Schiff says

- By Katia Dmitrieva Bloomberg News

WASHINGTON — A senior Democratic lawmaker said he hasn’t seen any evidence that materials the FBI seized from Donald Trump’s home were properly declassifi­ed, casting doubt on the former president’s explanatio­ns.

“And the idea that 18 months after the fact Donald Trump could simply announce, ‘Well, I’m retroactiv­ely declassify­ing, or whatever I took home had the effect of declassify­ing them,’ is absurd,” Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., chair of the House Intelligen­ce Committee, said Sunday on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

Trump said Friday that everything taken by federal agents at his Mar-a-Lago resort Aug. 8 was “all declassifi­ed” and “they didn’t need to ‘seize’ anything.” Some of the former president’s supporters have claimed he has the power to declassify documents on his own.

Schiff and House Oversight Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney have asked

U.S. intelligen­ce to provide a damage assessment of the seized records. They include the U.S. government’s top secrecy rating of “top secret/sensitive compartmen­ted informatio­n,” according to a search warrant inventory unsealed Friday.

“We should determine whether there was any effort during the presidency to go through the process of declassifi­cation,” Schiff said. “I’ve seen no evidence of that, nor have they presented any evidence of that.” While a president can request or initiate a declassifi­cation, the original classifyin­g agency “must undergo a process to complete the declassifi­cation,” according to former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade.

Based on the warrant, prosecutor­s indicated they are exploring possible violations of the Espionage Act among other allegation­s.

In Trump’s latest response to the search on his Truth Social platform, he argued that the documents were covered by attorney-client privilege or executive privilege and shouldn’t have been taken.

Fox News earlier reported Trump’s team “was informed” that some boxes and documents were covered by attorney-client privilege. Citing sources it didn’t identify, Fox also said some records could be covered by executive privilege.

In June, at least one lawyer for the former president signed a statement declaring all of the classified material stored at Mar-aLago was returned to the government, The New York Times reported Saturday, citing people with knowledge of the document.

 ?? ?? Schiff
Schiff

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States