Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition
Panel clears border agents every time
Set up this year, its reviews in 8 cases draw criticism
WASHINGTON — In rural Arizona, a border agent shot at and missed a migrant who had cocked his arm to throw a rock. At a California border station, a man died after being hit with a Taser three times.
Neither time did agents breach Customs and Border Protection policy, according to a board set up this year to provide accountability and oversight for how agents deploy force in their often dangerous border confrontations. So far, the board has considered eight cases, and it has cleared agents each time.
The latest four case reviews illustrate the challenges for an agency struggling to overhaul its practices after a string of alleged abuses including high-profile cross-border shootings, sometimes in response to thrown rocks. The board’s creation was the latest step in a four-year effort to modernize policing standards at Customs and Border Protection and in particular in the Border Patrol, with its military-style culture.
Civil rights advocates who work on border policy say they are disappointed in the reviews. One said he was disturbed that the board cleared the Arizona shooting; others have said the Border Patrol essentially sanctioned agents firing their weapons instead of retreating in response to rocks.
“That certainly raises a whole lot of alarms in our minds,” said Christian Ramirez, director of the Southern Border Communities Coalition. “That seems to counter what law enforcement experts have already established — using a firearm against a rock-thrower should not be within policy.”
The summaries released by the board don’t reveal why its members concluded that the agents stayed within the rules, nor do they criticize the agency’s policies or suggest how agents might have better handled the confrontations. The board has recommended 18 changes in policy and training, but Customs and Border Protection has not released them.
“You don’t see what the recommendations are, and they don’t really tie the conclusions to the policies in a clear manner,” said Chris Rickerd, a border policy expert at the American Civil Liberties Union. “These short clearances really speak to the need for a different type of transparency in these cases.”
Concerns over curbing potential abuses have become sharper since the election of Donald Trump as president. He promised tougher border enforcement as a central theme of his campaign.
He worries that groups like his, which tracks violent border encounters, will be shut out during a Trump administration.
Four years ago, facing growing outrage and lawsuits, Customs and Border Protection began to re-examine its practices, starting with a review of 67 cases by a professional policing group that found serious failings in how the agency limited deadly force. The agency in 2014 adopted a policy manual that, among other changes, instructs agents to try to avoid shooting at rock throwers and to retreat first.
Ramirez said he’d never heard of the latest such shooting until the report was released.
On patrol in April 2015, two agents split up to look for a group of migrants. One agent saw five men carrying burlap packs, the kind commonly used by drug mules. He hid behind a small tree and, when he figured he’d been spotted, ordered them to stop.
Four scattered, but one picked up a rock and raised his arm. The agent fired one shot from his rifle and missed. The man dropped the rock and ran away.
In that case, and in two others reported in July, the board, made up of officials from Customs and Border Protection and civil rights officials from the departments of Justice and Homeland Security, concluded that firing at rock throwers was justified because the agents faced a legitimate threat.
In the San Ysidro border station case, on Christmas Eve 2014, Francisco Cesena of El Cajon was detained after a records check showed he was wanted on a warrant. Agents say a search turned up a package with 7 grams of heroin taped to his groin.
Officials say Cesena jumped a desk and began punching an officer. In the ensuing struggle, an officer pressed a Taser against his body, firing three times in drive stun mode, which delivers a painful electric shock but not paralysis.
The Border Patrol has a history of excessive force involving the Taser, and the 2014 manual says agents should not use the device more than three times. Matthew Klein, assistant Customs and Border Protection commissioner in charge of internal investigations, says that for each time the Taser trigger is pulled during a confrontation, the review panel examines “whether at that very moment the agent used appropriate force” to counter resistance.
Cesena’s sister, Brenda Cesena-Cruz of El Cajon, says she isn’t satisfied with the findings in the review of her brother’s death, noting that an autopsy also found that he suffered broken ribs and bruises.
“I don’t believe that anyone deserves to be treated the way he was treated,” she said. “We’re going to continue to seek justice.”
Klein says he’s confident the board is working as it’s supposed to, though he wouldn’t comment on its decisions. The board reviews each shooting and every case that results in a death or serious injury.
“The board looks very carefully at each incident and examines the agent’s actions based on policy and what is allowed by law, based on the threat,” he said.
As for the recommendations, Klein says Customs and Border Protection intends to release summaries but not the specifics of each case. The case studies may be used to further change training, he said, or to rewrite tactics and policies.
Klein said the changes at Customs and Border Protection have already reduced agents’ use of force, including firearms. Uses of force declined 26 percent in the fiscal year that ended in October 2015; for the first 11 months of fiscal year 2016, the latest data available, uses of force are slightly higher, but shootings decreased.
The president of the union representing Border Patrol agents says the useof-force rules are still open for negotiations between the union and the agency. He says he is mostly satisfied with the current policies, but not always happy with how they are applied by Customs and Border Protection leaders.
“They got a lot of policy correct there, but there are tweaks that have to happen,” said Brandon Judd.
“If you feel that serious bodily injury or death can result from what an individual is doing, we’re authorized to use deadly force,” he said. “That hasn’t changed.”