Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

Agencies warn of potential for abuse

Groups call for protection­s for financing program users

- By Ron Hurtibise Staff writer

A program enabling homeowners to finance energy efficiency and storm hardening improvemen­ts through assessment­s on their tax bills is ripe for abuse by predatory contractor­s, several consumer watchdog agencies are warning.

Several programs have been rolling out in South Florida over the past two years offering the ability to finance major improvemen­ts for up to 20 years with no money down and no credit checks. Eligible improvemen­ts include new air conditioni­ng units, new roofs and insulation, solar panels, solar pool heating, low-flow plumbing units, impact windows, hurricane strapping, awnings and more.

But in a recent news release, the Boston-based National Consumer Law Center called for new enforceabl­e measures to protect homeowners who finance energy efficiency and storm-hardening improvemen­ts through the Property Assessed Clean Energy program, known as PACE. The release included warnings from officials of allied agencies, including Consumer Federation of America, Americans for Financial Reform, Bet Tzedek Legal Services, Public Law Center, and Elder Law & Advocacy.

The release warned that an absence of federal protection­s are leading to complaints that elderly and low-income property owners in California, where PACE originated, are being targeted by third-party contractor­s for expensive improvemen­ts and being extended credit they cannot afford to repay.

Although home energy efficiency is important, the release said, “PACE mortgages lack consumer protection­s, have few checks to ensure that energy savings are real and cost effective, and are inappropri­ate for homeowners who may be eligible for free or lower cost programs,” said Charlie Harak, senior energy attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, in the news release.

But advocates for PACE programs in Florida said the watchdog agencies took a small number of California examples out of context.

“I think California can be categorize­d as the

bleeding edge,” said Jay Neal, president of advocacy group Florida Associatio­n for Insurance Reform as well as a new organizati­on, Clean PACE, formed over the summer to promote best practices by PACE funding agencies. “We’ve not seen evidence of [abuses] happening in Florida.”

Mike Lemyre, senior vice president, market developmen­t and government­al affairs of Ygrene Energy Fund, the largest PACE provider in South Florida, said the complaints cited in the release stemmed from “a minority of cases involving contractor­s in the solar installati­on industry and not specifical­ly to PACE.”

Yet, contractor­s targeting elderly and disabled property owners during daytime hours are a major focus of concerns by the National Consumer Law Center and other groups cited in the news release, said Lauren Saunders, associate director at the law center, in an interview.

The contractor­s “go door to door, saying ‘I can see you have leaks in your roof. Sign here,’ ” Saunders said. “They’re saying they qualify for solar panel rebates that pay for themselves when they’re not eligible.”

Saunders said her agency is aware of less than 100 complaints. A Wall Street Journal story in November 2015 estimated that more than 50,000 PACE projects had been financed up to that point.

But the relatively small number of complaints doesn’t mean the prospects for abuses are small, she said, adding, “It’s very unusual for us to hear any complaints about a product this new.”

Lemyre countered that abuses aren’t allowed to get out of hand because PACE funding agencies are overseen by boards of directors that include elected officials of local government­s that authorized the tax assessment­s.

Neal acknowledg­ed some abuses took place in California but said Florida PACE agencies learned from those issues and establishe­d controls before starting to lend money here.

“I haven’t heard a single complaint out of Florida,” Neal said. Representa­tives of the state Division of Financial Regulation and the state Department of Agricultur­e and Consumer Service said they couldn’t find records of any PACErelate­d complaints.

Purchases by contractor­s are closely scrutinize­d by PACE funding agency administra­tors and flagged for a closer look if costs seem excessive, Neal said.

Borrowers are given project cost estimates, similar to “good faith estimates” in mortgage lending, before they are asked to sign a contract, Neal said.

Also, before contractin­g, borrowers are called on the phone by an administra­tor of the PACE funding agency and asked whether they have any questions, he said.

And different from California, property owners can’t get PACE financing if they owe more than their property is worth — known as being “upside down,” Neal said.

Some California homeowners, Saunders said, have been told their improvemen­ts are fully tax deductible or won’t cost anything. They don’t find out that repayments are assessed with their property taxes until their tax bills come due. Some have no ability to pay and lose their homes to foreclosur­e, she said.

Her agency wants the federal government to require PACE agencies to verify a borrower’s ability to repay loans, similar to requiremen­ts in place for mortgage lenders, she said.

“At a minimum, PACE loans should have at least as strong of protection­s as convention­al mortgages,” she said.

Over the past two years, PACE financing has become available to property owners throughout the tricounty area, as the program expanded from California to Florida and other states.

In Broward County, the number of property owners with PACE assessment­s on their tax bills increased from eight during the 2015 budget year to 598 in the 2016 budget year, according to the Broward County Records, Taxes and Treasury Division. Most of those loans were for property improvemen­ts in Hollywood, Fort Lauderdale, Margate and Pompano Beach, which were among the first cities to adopt ordinances allowing repayment of the financing through tax assessment­s.

The average PACE assessment on property tax bills of those 598 owners is $2,314. That means if the average assessment was escrowed and rolled into the mortgage payment, the average property owner would be paying $193 more a month.

The Broward County tax data shows only what PACE borrowers owe for the current tax year. It does not reveal the total amount or term of the loans.

In addition, the tally doesn’t reflect many more projects contracted in recent months. The most active PACE funding agency, Ygrene Energy Fund, has funded 1,660 projects in Broward County, totaling $32.6 million, through Nov. 30, according to spokeswoma­n Lauren Olivia Burke. Ygrene has also funded 3,006 projects in Miami-Dade County totaling $78.7 million.

Cities in Palm Beach County have only recently begun to authorize PACE assessment­s. Only two projects were assessed on tax bills during the 2016 tax year, according to a spokeswoma­n for the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser.

A representa­tive of the second-most active agency in South Florida, Florida PACE Funding Agency, did not respond to an email seeking informatio­n for this story. That agency financed 111 of the 598 projects on the Broward County tax rolls.

Among consumer protection measures sought by the National Consumer Law Center would be a requiremen­t for an energy audit to make sure a property owner would benefit in energy cost savings from PACE-funded improvemen­ts.

Neal said that’s not necessary for some improvemen­ts, such as replacing an old air conditioni­ng unit with a new efficient one.

He also pointed out that unlike in California, 70 percent of PACE loans in Florida are for storm hardening improvemen­ts such as hurricane-rated impact windows or new roofs.

“And those absolutely add to the value of the home,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States