Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

Trump shifts US tone on nukes

Trump’s severe shift in US tone on nukes rattles globe

- By Tracy Wilkinson and Ralph Vartabedia­n Tracy Wilkinson reported from Washington and Ralph Vartabedia­n from Los Angeles. Special correspond­ent Mansur Mirovalev contribute­d from Moscow. tracy.wilkinson@latimes.com

President-elect puzzles foreign policy experts after “arms race” comment.

WASHINGTON — Donald Trump shook up longstandi­ng internatio­nal security norms Friday by reportedly suggesting a renewed arms race, a day after he tweeted that the United States should “greatly strengthen and expand” its nuclear weapons capability.

Trump’s meaning was sufficient­ly cryptic, perhaps deliberate­ly so, that disarmamen­t experts, foreign leaders and U.S. officials were left off balance — and unsure if he plans to upend U.S. policy on nuclear arms after he enters the White House in 28 days.

Since his election, Trump has rocked the foreign policy establishm­ent by praising Russian President Vladimir Putin, and by speaking to the president of Taiwan and questionin­g the U.S. “one-China” policy that only recognizes Beijing.

But speaking recklessly about nuclear proliferat­ion poses high risks in an unstable world.

On Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared to shrug off Trump’s tweet as “nothing new,” telling a news conference in Moscow that he would welcome a Trump invitation to visit America.

China appeared more concerned. A Foreign Ministry spokesman said Beijing was “closely watching” the incoming administra­tion’s nuclear policies, adding that the “country with the largest nuclear arsenal should assume a special and prior responsibi­lity on nuclear disarmamen­t.”

The numbers fluctuate but Russia currently has about 400 more warheads, while the United States has 170 more delivery systems, according to the State Department Bureau of Arms Control, Verificati­on and Compliance. Under the New START Treaty, both countries will deploy no more than 1,550 strategic weapons by February 2018.

Whatever his intention, Trump’s comments mark a severe shift in the tone and substance that Republican and Democratic presidents have used in the past when discussing nuclear weapons.

“It is a significan­t departure from what we have heard in the past,” said Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons expert at the Federation of American Scientists, a nonpartisa­n group that seeks to reduce the spread and power of nuclear weapons.

“None of them came out in this brazen way,” he added. “That means countries around the world are trying to figure out what is going on. Is it a mad man or a new policy that they have to deal with? It creates uncertaint­y and suspicion both among allies and adversarie­s.”

The flap began Thursday after Putin was reported telling a defense ministry meeting in Moscow that Russia needs “to strengthen the military potential of strategic nuclear forces.”

Apparently in response, Trump tweeted that “the U.S. must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to it senses regarding nukes.”

The back-and-forth raised concerns that the two countries, which control 95 percent of the world’s nuclear weapons, might be resuming the destabiliz­ing arms race that defined much of the Cold War. On Friday, Trump acknowledg­ed those fears in an off-camera conversati­on with the hosts of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” talk show, which he reportedly watches regularly.

Mika Brzezinski, dressed in festive pajamas before a roaring fire, quoted Trump as saying: “Let it be an arms race because we will outmatch them at every pass and outlast them all.”

She didn’t say if Trump meant it as a joke or a threat. But as has become increasing­ly common, Trump’s aides rushed out statements trying to clarify what he meant, or at least may have meant.

In this case, they argued that Trump wasn’t calling for a new arms race, saying he wants to modernize the U.S. nuclear arsenal, a policy that President Barack Obama has pursued.

Those claims didn’t mollify disarmamen­t experts in Washington.

“The real consequenc­e of an arms race would be that the sides would, at great expense, pile up lots more nuclear weapons … and gain nothing in terms of improved security,” said Steven Pifer, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine who now is a senior foreign policy fellow at the Brookings Institutio­n think tank.

In what appeared an effort to ease those concerns, Trump released a warm holiday greeting Friday afternoon that Putin had sent him. In it, the Russian leader said he hoped to “bring our level of collaborat­ion on the internatio­nal scene to a qualitativ­ely new level.”

“A very nice letter from Vladimir Putin; his thoughts are so correct,” Trump in a statement.

 ?? EVAN VUCCI/AP ?? President-elect Donald Trump’s reported comments on nuclear weapons have unnerved U.S. experts and foreign leaders.
EVAN VUCCI/AP President-elect Donald Trump’s reported comments on nuclear weapons have unnerved U.S. experts and foreign leaders.
 ??  ?? Putin
Putin

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States