Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

Seeking ‘Planet Nine’? Take a number

- By Joel Achenbach

The hunt for “Planet Nine” is intensifyi­ng, and anyone can join in.

You’ll need a computer with an internet connection, plenty of patience and the determinat­ion to hunt for something that would be very dim and might not actually exist.

Planet Nine is the hypothetic­al planet beyond Pluto that astronomer­s have been buzzing about for a couple of years. If it’s there, it’s probably big — larger than Earth, perhaps a “mini-Neptune.”

A new initiative by NASA and the University of California at Berkeley, called Backyard Worlds: Planet 9, is crowdsourc­ing the hunt for Planet Nine. It will use archived observatio­ns from NASA’s Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer mission, which scanned the skies for asteroids and other faint objects. It’s possible that Planet Nine — or perhaps a “brown dwarf ” star or two — is lurking in its speckled images of space.

This planet could be 500 times as far from the sun as Earth is, but it would still be part of our solar system, with a highly elliptical orbit that never takes it anywhere close to the sun. Planet Nine should not be confused with the many “exoplanets” discovered orbiting distant stars.

The mystery planet’s existence is inferred from the orbits of many smaller bodies in the outer solar system. They orbit the sun and cluster in a manner that suggests the possible gravitatio­nal influence of an unseen, large planet. The evidence for its existence has been getting stronger, Caltech astronomer Mike Brown said.

“I’m just going to tell you: It’s there,” Brown said.

Not everyone is persuaded.

“The evidence is very intriguing, but I don’t think I can put a high likelihood on it yet,” said Renu Malhotra, a University of Arizona professor of planetary science. “I see the evidence as being quite soft, still.”

Even the name is iffy. Planet Nine? Planet X? Planet 10? It’s confusing.

There used to be nine officially recognized planets in our solar system — the ninth being little Pluto, discovered in 1930. But after Brown and other astronomer­s began discoverin­g small planetlike objects in the outer solar system, a debate erupted over the definition of a “planet.”

In 2006, the Internatio­nal Astronomic­al Union decided that Pluto was a member of a class of objects to be known as “dwarf planets.”

Astronomer­s kept discoverin­g these distant objects in the remote Zip codes of the solar system, in what is known as the Kuiper belt. And then a pattern seemed to reveal itself.

In 2014, astronomer­s Scott Sheppard of the Carnegie Institutio­n and Chad Trujillo of the Gemini Observator­y in Hawaii published a paper suggesting that there may be a massive “perturber” in the outer solar system that affects the orbits of smaller objects. Sheppard and Trujillo said those smaller objects orbit the sun at an angle as if avoiding the hidden, larger planet.

“It would resemble a giant frozen snowball,” Sheppard told The Washington Post in 2015.

Brown set out to debunk Sheppard and Trujillo’s conjecture, but he wound up providing supporting evidence. Last year, Brown and Caltech colleague Konstantin Batygin published a paper in the Astronomic­al Journal that offered a possible orbit for the hidden planet, which a news release from Caltech referred to as “Planet Nine.”

Brown said last week that additional observatio­ns of distant, small objects and ensuing calculatio­ns and modeling suggest that Planet Nine is roughly eight times as massive as Earth and slightly closer to the sun than previously thought. He said it is probably the core of a giant planet that was ejected from the inner solar system long ago. He said it’s likely to have an atmosphere, which would make it broader, warmer and easier to detect. If it’s a dense, rocky planet, it’ll be smaller, colder, darker and harder to find.

Sheppard said he has also become more optimistic about the planet’s existence.

“We still see a clustering trend. That brings me to about 90 percent sure that this planet exists beyond Pluto,” he said. “I don’t think there’s a credible alternativ­e hypothesis right now.”

Malhotra points out that this hypothesis is based on relatively few observatio­ns — that this is still in the “regime of small numbers.”

But she says there’s another possibilit­y that emerges from the way the ecliptic — the plane in which the plants orbit the sun — gets warped in the farther reaches of the solar system. That could be a sign that there’s yet another planet, maybe the size of Earth, that’s not as far away as the hypothesiz­ed Planet Nine, Malhotra said.

So why wouldn’t we have seen it?

“It could be hiding in the galaxy,” Malhotra said. She means the Milky Way.

Finding a dim, icy planet against the thick river of bright stars is a challenge. “There are parts of the sky that our surveys haven’t covered well,” she said.

 ?? R. HURT/CALTECH ?? An illustrati­on of Planet Nine with the sun far behind it.
R. HURT/CALTECH An illustrati­on of Planet Nine with the sun far behind it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States