Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

Net neutrality legislatio­n needed to foster innovation in Florida

- By Brad Swanson Brad Swanson is president and CEO of the Florida Cable Telecommun­ications Associatio­n.

When the internet launched in the ’90s, it ushered in an era of revolution­ary innovation.

In D.C., policymake­rs from both parties had the vision to see that America would need a responsibl­e yet competitiv­e regulatory framework that would encourage innovation and private-sector investment and accelerate the deployment of network infrastruc­ture.

The Federal Communicat­ions Commission (FCC) demonstrat­ed leadership by establishi­ng regulation­s for the internet known as Title I that would empower free market competitio­n to flourish while driving technologi­cal advancemen­t in an emerging industry.

As a result of that framework, the United States has a broadband network that is the envy of the world. Here in Florida, more than three million households now have a high-speed connection to the internet.

In less than 25 years, private-sector internet companies and their innovation­s have improved millions of people’s online experience­s, moving from a snail’s pace dial-up connection to high-speed, unlimited, 24/7 access available everywhere, from their homes to their smart phones. Now, streaming rich video content, distance learning and telemedici­ne are one click or tap away.

Only recently under the Obama administra­tion did the FCC’s regulatory approach change. Citing concerns over protecting net neutrality, the FCC unilateral­ly applied antiquated, utility-style regulation­s to broadband internet companies known as Title II.

Unlike utility-style Title II regulation­s, which promote only one choice for every consumer similar to your local water or power company, Title I regulation­s created an environmen­t where customers can choose the providers and products that best suit their needs.

Further, the utility-style regulation­s have slowed the deployment of sophistica­ted high-speed networks, which Florida’s families and businesses increasing­ly depend upon every day.

There are no winners resulting from these bureaucrat­ic changes. Floridians will continue to lose out as the current regulation­s slowly choke away the dynamic online environmen­t behind the world’s most valuable companies and greatest entreprene­urial success stories of our time.

The policies best-suited to protect net neutrality versus the policies that regulate public utilities are two very different things.

Florida’s broadband companies continue to support net neutrality and agree that rules prohibitin­g anyone from blocking, throttling, or unfairly discrimina­ting against internet traffic should be in place. This core principle of an open internet experience for everyone is not controvers­ial to the industry; it is the standard.

However, the regulatory policies bestequipp­ed to legally safeguard the spirit and principles of net neutrality should not look anything like antiquated utility-style policies.

That’s why we urge Congress to pass long-term legislatio­n to secure open internet protection­s while securing the FCC’s traditiona­l Title I regulatory approach, which has empowered innovation­s and expanded access to networks faster than anywhere else on Earth.

Under this model, the state of Florida and its economy will continue to lead the way in competitiv­eness and marketplac­e innovation, so all our citizens can leverage the power of the internet for their future.

Most importantl­y, individual­s, families and businesses throughout Florida can continue to connect to each other and to the world without threatenin­g investment, innovation, jobs and access for all Floridians.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States