Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

DNA: Viking he-man was a she

- By Amy Ellis Nutt

For more than a century after it was found, a skeleton ensconced in a Viking grave, surrounded by military weapons, was assumed to be that of a battle-hardened male. No more.

The warrior was, in fact, female. And not just any female, but a Viking warrior woman, a shieldmaid­en, like an ancient Daenerys Targaryen, Queen of the Dragons from “Game of Thrones.”

The artifacts entombed with the 1,000-year-old bones and unearthed in 1889 in Birka, Sweden, included two shields, a sword, an ax, a spear, armor-piercing arrows and a battle knife — not to mention the remnants of two horses.

Such weapons of war among grave goods, archaeolog­ists long assumed, meant the Viking had been male.

Yet modern-day genetics testing on the DNA extracted from a tooth and an arm bone has confirmed otherwise. The skeleton, known as Bj 581, belonged to someone with two X chromosome­s.

“We were blinded by the warrior equipment,” one of the researcher­s, Anders Gotherstro­m, said in an email to The Washington Post last week. “The grave-goods shout ‘warrior’ at you, and nothing else.”

Gotherstro­m, along with nine other scientists from the Universiti­es of Stockholm and Uppsala, announced the results in a paper in the American Journal of Physical Anthropolo­gy. Theirs is the first genetic proof at least some Viking women were warriors.

The shieldmaid­en, whose teeth identify her as at least 30, also appeared to be of high status. Her grave is on a prominent, elevated piece of ground between the town and a hilltop fort, and also contained a full set of gaming pieces and a gaming board, typically used by military leaders to work out battle strategy.

Although some weapons have been found in other female Viking graves, none included only weapons — or so many of them.

“This is exactly what you would expect from male warrior graves,” said Cat Jarman, a British archaeolog­ist not associated with the discovery. “There’s nothing that says it was a woman ... [The contents] were not exactly domestic.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States