Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

U.S. sanctions Russians for election meddling

Administra­tion implements actions for ‘nefarious acts’

- By Brian Bennett and Chris Megerian Washington Bureau Times staff writer Cathleen Decker contribute­d. brian.bennett@latimes.com

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion on Thursday announced sanctions against 19 Russian individual­s and five organizati­ons for meddling in the 2016 election and for other “destructiv­e cyberattac­ks” still targeting the U.S. electrical grid and water systems.

While the sanctions were the strongest against Russia to date by this administra­tion, President Donald Trump declined to personally criticize Moscow directly for its attacks against the country, or even mention the sanctions, when he briefly met with reporters after the Treasury Department’s announceme­nt.

He simply acknowledg­ed, only when asked by reporters, that he agreed with British Prime Minister Theresa May that Russia was culpable for a separate nerve-agent attack March 4 in Salisbury, England, that targeted a Russian-born double agent and his adult daughter and injured other British citizens.

“It certainly looks like the Russians were behind it — something that should never, ever happen,” Trump said, adding, “We’re taking it very seriously.”

The poisoning in Salisbury was “a very sad situation,” the president added, as he met Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar.

The president’s comment was far less condemnato­ry on the poisonings 11 days ago than a separate statement that his administra­tion issued on Thursday with Britain, France and Germany. That joint statement called Russia’s use of the military-grade nerve agent a “clear violation” of internatio­nal law and said that Moscow’s failure to respond to Britain’s charge “further underlines Russia’s responsibi­lity.”

Trump has not criticized Russia for its election meddling, which included spreading fake news stories and hacking the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign chief, according to the U.S. intelligen­ce community. He has, however, repeatedly criticized the federal probe of that interferen­ce and possible Trump campaign involvemen­t as a “witch hunt.”

Yet the new Treasury sanctions echo indictment­s in that probe. They include measures against 13 individual­s and three entities, including the Internet Research Agency, that have been charged as part of the ongoing Russia investigat­ion by special counsel Robert Mueller.

The sanctions also target six other individual­s and two entities that are described as “cyber actors” operating on behalf of the Russian government.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said the new sanctions are part of a broad effort to address “ongoing nefarious attacks” by President Vladimir Putin’s government.

“The Administra­tion is confrontin­g and countering malign Russian cyber activity, including their attempted interferen­ce in U.S. elections, destructiv­e cyberattac­ks, and intrusions targeting critical infrastruc­ture,” Mnuchin said in a statement.

A national security official told reporters, on condition of anonymity to describe intelligen­ce matters, that Russian military hackers were behind both the destructiv­e “NotPetya” malware attack last year that did billions of dollars in damage across Europe and the United States — disrupting shipping, banking and medicine production — and attempts to infiltrate U.S. electrical grids, nuclear facilities, aviation, and water services that are “long-term and still ongoing.”

The United States and Britain last month jointly blamed Russia for the NotPetya attack, which Treasury on Thursday called “the most destructiv­e and costly cyber-attack in history.”

One of the most prominent individual­s sanctioned was Yevgeniy Prigozhin, a close associate of Putin known as “Putin’s chef ” because of his lucrative government catering contracts, and the sanctioned entities included the Internet Research Agency that Prigozhin founded, based in St. Petersburg, Russia.

According to Mueller’s indictment, the I.R.A. created fake social media accounts to sow discord during the 2016 presidenti­al campaign, orchestrat­ed pro-Trump rallies from afar, and hired actors to dress as Clinton in cages at demonstrat­ions, among other provocatio­ns.

Many of the new sanctions were issued to comply with a bipartisan law passed by Congress last summer that required the Trump administra­tion to add sanctions to those imposed by the Obama administra­tion in late 2016. Trump signed the law reluctantl­y, with a statement that he believed the legislatio­n was “seriously flawed,” and his administra­tion is months late in meeting the law’s deadline for action.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States