Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

Trump seeks spending cuts on kid health

- By Damian Paletta and Erica Werner

President Donald Trump is sending a plan to Congress that calls for stripping more than $15 billion in approved spending, with the hope that it will temper conservati­ve angst over ballooning budget deficits. Almost half of the proposed cuts would come from two accounts within the Children’s Health Insurance Program that White House officials

said either expired last year or aren’t expected to be drawn upon. An aditional $800 million in cuts would come from money created by the Affordable Care Act in 2010 to test innovative payment and service delivery models.

Those are just some of the more than 30 programs the White House is proposing to Congress for “rescission,” culling back money that was previously authorized. Once the White House sends the request to Congress, lawmakers have 45 days to vote on the plan or a scaled-back version of it through a simple majority vote.

CHIP is a program created and reauthoriz­ed by Congress that provides health care to low-income children. Congress extended the program for six years several months ago.

The White House’s other proposed cut to CHIP is a $2 billion reduction that pares back contingenc­y funds set aside in case states see higher than expected enrollment, a senior administra­tion official said. They aren’t expecting to see a jump in enrollment, though, in part because the economy is improving.

A senior administra­tion official said Democrats should recognize that much of this package represents untapped accounts, and that cutting the money would create savings without affecting operations.

But Democrats have said they are watching with skepticism. Many Democrats have called for expanding programs like CHIP, and they are often fiercely protective of anything related to the Affordable Care Act.

White House officials and GOP leaders think this package of proposed cuts could begin to signal to conservati­ves that they are taking steps to reverse a freespendi­ng fiscal approach they embraced since Trump took office.

Conservati­ves erupted in March after Trump signed a $1.3 trillion spending package that included a number of budget requests from Democrats, and pushed for a “rescission” package to pare it by $30 to $60 billion.

But Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and others argued that would amount to going back on a bipartisan deal. The spending bill would not be touched in the package the White House plans to send to Congress this week. Instead, the White House plans to follow up with another request for close to $10 billion in additional spending cuts later this year that would target some of that money.

The budget strategy for both parties is uncertain heading into the November midterm elections.

Republican­s must agree to a new spending deal with Democrats by Sept. 30 or trigger a government shutdown, something Trump said last week he would embrace if he doesn’t get additional money to build a wall on the Mexico border.

Congress can “rescind” money it has authorized if it secures a majority of votes in the House, and then the Senate, using powers under the Congressio­nal Budget and Impoundmen­t Act of 1974.

The law hasn’t been used in this way in roughly 20 years. The senior administra­tion official said this is the biggest rescission request that has ever been sent to Congress.

The proposed cuts to CHIP would come in part from cutting $5 billion from an account meant to reimburse states for additional expenses in 2017. Because the money wasn’t used last year, it can’t be used this year, the senior administra­tion official said, but it remains on the government’s balance sheet because it was approved by Congress.

Other reductions would come from a range of areas. They include cutting $133 million for a railroad unemployme­nt program that expired in 2012, the senior administra­tion official said.

Successful­ly pushing these changes through Congress could placate conservati­ves and put Democrats on the spot about cutting spending. A number of Senate Democrats are running for reelection in states Trump won easily in 2016, and they will likely need support from Trump voters to stay in office.

Republican­s control a large majority of votes in the House of Representa­tives, but their margin in the Senate is razor thin. They might need support from Democrats to approve the spending cuts, depending on the health of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

The March spending bill led to such outrage among Republican­s that just hours before signing it into law, Trump said in a Twitter post that he might veto it. He backed down and said the spending agreement was a necessary compromise to secure more money for the Pentagon, but he vowed to never sign a bill like that again.

He has also demanded that Congress give him the power to use a “line-item veto” on spending bills, which would mean he could simply eliminate any part of a spending package he didn’t want. This was ruled to be unconstitu­tional by the Supreme Court.

But, in his first 14 months in office, Trump has never enforced a veto threat on spending, and Democrats have repeatedly found ways to win spending priorities by holding out during negotiatio­ns. Through a combinatio­n of spending increases and tax cuts, the White House and GOP-led Congress have greatly expanded the budget deficit since Trump was elected.

The government spent $3.98 trillion and brought in $3.32 trillion in revenue last year, leaving a deficit of $665 billion, according to the Congressio­nal Budget Office. The deficit this year is projected to widen to $804 billion, and hit $981 billion in 2019. In 2020, the government will record deficits that exceed $1 trillion annually unless changes are made.

With rising interest rates, higher debt levels can prove incredibly costly. Republican­s railed about government spending during the Obama administra­tion, but they have been torn since Trump took office, as he has largely shown an indifferen­ce to spending restraint.

Last week, as aides prepared the package of spending cuts to offer Congress, Trump was demanding more spending, for example, to build a wall along the Mexico border.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States