Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

Immigrants: DACA renewal a roll of dice

Calculatio­n, fear keep many from renewing status

- By Joseph Tanfani joseph.tanfani@latimes.com

WASHINGTON — For thousands of young immigrant men and women living in the country illegally, a judge’s order in January amounted to a reprieve — a chance to renew their legal protection­s after President Donald Trump’s decision last year to kill the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

But many DACA recipients have been slow to reach for the lifeline, according to figures from U.S. Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Services. The pace of applicatio­ns and renewals has picked up dramatical­ly in the last few months, but many DACA recipients are still hanging back.

More than 9,000 people formerly protected by DACA already have lost their status and are now at risk of being deported.

Lawyers, activists and people enrolled in DACA say that part of the reason for the slow pace is confusion spawned by court fights. Part is also anxiety spawned by the unforgivin­g enforcemen­t policies of the Trump administra­tion.

“We’re telling people, ‘You need to renew.’ The problem is, they don’t trust that anymore,” said Elias Rosenfeld, a student and activist who was able to renew his own DACA protection­s.

Lawyers say some clients are afraid to put in renewal applicatio­ns, worried about attracting attention from enforcemen­t agents.

“I think there’s massive anxiety,” said David Leopold, an immigratio­n lawyer in Cleveland. “Look at the president. You don’t know from one day to the next what’s going to happen with this White House.”

Ever since the DACA program was created by President Barack Obama in 2012, after the collapse of immigratio­n reform efforts in Congress, it has been a rallying point for immigrant advocates — and a target for the anti-immigratio­n wing of the GOP.

Under DACA, some immigrants brought to the country illegally as children and who otherwise have clean records can receive a two-year reprieve from deportatio­n. Close to 800,000 of them have had an opportunit­y to work legally and attend school as DACA recipients. Last September, the administra­tion announced an end to the program, with an immediate cutoff in new applicatio­ns and a tight window to renew for people whose protection­s were running out.

But the program was restarted after a Jan. 10 decision by U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco, who said that the administra­tion relied on flawed legal reasoning by Attorney General Jeff Sessions in ending the program; federal judges in Brooklyn and Washington, D.C., subsequent­ly wrote similar decisions.

Renewal applicatio­ns were slow to come in after the window reopened on Jan. 10 — 11,000 through Jan. 31. U.S. Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Services didn’t approve any of them at first, statistics show.

But more than 59,000 applicatio­ns came in during February and March, and 32,000 were approved, the figures show.

Counting applicatio­ns already in the pipeline before January, the agency approved more than 55,000 applicatio­ns in the first three months of the year. Another 51,000 were pending on March 31, a jump from December.

Rosenfeld, 20, was brought to the U.S. from Venezuela when he was 6. He entered on a legal visa, but his mother died when he was 10, which meant he couldn’t renew the visa and fell out of legal status.

Now a student at Brandeis University, he spends much of his time in Washington, lobbying members of Congress for legislatio­n protecting Dreamers.

With his original DACA permit due to expire this August, Rosenfeld was shut out by last year’s order ending the program. The court decision reversing that order allowed him to apply for renewal.

“It was an immediate blessing,” he said. “It at least extends our future in this country for two more years.”

The federal statistics tell a story of thousands of procrastin­ations, private calculatio­ns and personal gambles. Many DACA recipients seemingly are betting that the courts will keep the doors to DACA open, at least for this year.

There’s a disincenti­ve to applying too early: Renewals are good for two years from the day they’re issued, not two years added on to the original period.

The decisions to wait could collective­ly add up to trouble later this year, assuming the program remains in effect. Of the 165,210 people whose DACA protection­s expire from June to December, only about 12 percent have applied for renewal, according to figures through March 31, suggesting that a surge is coming, along with possible bottleneck­s in an already slow system.

A USCIS spokesman said the agency is handling DACA applicatio­ns as they arrive, with a goal of deciding them within 120 days, though lawyers say the agency often takes longer.

“I think it’s a real difficult decision,” said Nicole Prchal Svajlenka, a senior policy analyst at the left-leaning Center for American Progress who has been tracking the DACA statistics. “Do you apply now and take what you can get, or wait and hope?”

Sonia S. Figueroa, an immigratio­n lawyer in Los Angeles, said that she’s advising clients to apply now, while the window is still open.

“If they’re going to jack you, they’re going to jack you anyway, so it makes no difference if you apply or not” in that regard, she said.

 ?? JEWEL SAMAD/GETTY-AFP ?? Activists say that part of the reason for the slow pace in renewals of DACA status is confusion spawned by court fights.
JEWEL SAMAD/GETTY-AFP Activists say that part of the reason for the slow pace in renewals of DACA status is confusion spawned by court fights.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States