Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

Brightline expansion to Orlando back on track; lawsuit tossed out

- By Jim Turner News Service of Florida

TALLAHASSE­E – Florida’s fledgling private passenger-rail service has had some reason for holiday cheer.

Days after Brightline got an extra six months to issue $1.15 billion in tax-exempt bonds needed to expand the service from South Florida to Orlando, U.S. District Judge Christophe­r Cooper on Monday tossed a lawsuit by Indian River County that sought to block the “private activity” bonds.

Brightline spokeswoma­n Ali Soule called Cooper’s ruling “well-reasoned.”

“The court’s decision adds momentum to our efforts of connecting Orlando to South Florida. We remain focused on exploring locations for a Brightline station in the Treasure Coast and are encouraged by the tremendous amounts of support we have received in the region,” Soule said.

The rail service has now prevailed in 10 rulings in cases initiated by Treasure Coast counties as it looks to put down a second track along a 128.5-mile stretch of single-track from West Palm Beach to Cocoa and then add 40 miles of track between Cocoa and Orlando.

Indian River County, which continued to press forward in the legal fight against the rail service after Martin County reached a settlement with Brightline, may determine its next move at a Jan. 8 meeting. Indian River and Martin counties have been key oppo-

nents of the rail service, pointing to concerns about issues such as safety.

“We’re disappoint­ed [with the ruling] but we’re discussing with outside counsel our options on how we move forward,” Kate Cotner, an assistant county attorney in Indian River County, told The Bond Buyer on Wednesday.

The county contended the U.S. Department of Transporta­tion exceeded its authority because the railroad was ineligible for the bonds under federal tax code. Part of the argument involved the federal agency categorizi­ng the rail project as a “qualified highway or surface freight transfer” facility.

Cooper wrote that federal Transporta­tion Secretary Elaine Chao’s approval, in part, met “statutory requiremen­ts and was a reasonable exercise of her discretion.”

Chao’s latest extension approval — the bonds were first approved in December 2017 with a May 31 deadline — appears to come with a warning that there won’t be another.

Derek Kan, an undersecre­tary of transporta­tion, advised Brightline that “any amount of unused bond allocation following an initial bond issuance will automatica­lly return to U.S. DOT's remaining aggregate amount of private activity bonds, and thus be available for other eligible applicants.”

Indian River County also argued that the Federal Railway Administra­tion violated the Administra­tive Procedure Act and the National Environmen­tal Policy Act by conducting a flawed and incomplete review of the public health and safety consequenc­es of the rail project.

Cooper wasn’t swayed by a number of the county’s arguments about issues such as the potential shift of freight traffic from day to night to accommodat­e the passenger-train schedule, increased noise and vibrations from faster freight trains and the threat to the structural stability of the older St. Lucie River Bridge from faster freight trains.

Cooper also noted that the Federal Railway Administra­tion determined that the project would have an overall beneficial effect on safety because the company would be required to introduce a variety of safety features, such as improved grade crossings.

U.S. Rep. Mario DiazBalart, a Miami Republican who chairs the House Transporta­tion Appropriat­ions Subcommitt­ee, said in a release provided by Brightline that he intends to continue working with Chao on moving the project forward.

The bond extension gives Brightline more time to complete a separate applicatio­n for a Railroad Rehabilita­tion and Improvemen­t Financing loan to further cover the cost of the Miami-to-Orlando service, which has been previously pegged at about $3 billion.

Brightline, which is being rebranded as Virgin Trains USA, has meet resistance from Treasure Coast officials and divided members of Florida’s congressio­nal delegation. It currently has stops in West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale and Miami and is planned to run north to Orlando. Brightline is also looking to extend the service between Orlando and Tampa.

Armed with an Oct. 31 report from the state Legislatur­e's Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountabi­lity that backed financial and safety concerns expressed by Brightline critics, Treasure Coast lawmakers are again expected to pursue more state oversight of passenger rail service during the 2019 legislativ­e session.

The report noted the state Department of Transporta­tion hasn’t used its authority to regulate rail service at Brightline’s expected speeds of between 81 mph and 125 mph.

 ?? JOE RAEDLE/GETTY ?? A lawsuit filed by Indian River County that would block bonds to expand Brightline’s service from Miami-Dade County to Orlando has been tossed out.
JOE RAEDLE/GETTY A lawsuit filed by Indian River County that would block bonds to expand Brightline’s service from Miami-Dade County to Orlando has been tossed out.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States