Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

The bridge to nowhere is no more

Fort Lauderdale made clear it didn’t want state’s $25 million project

- By Susannah Bryan South Florida Sun Sentinel

FORT LAUDERDALE – It’s been called the bridge to nowhere. A total monstrosit­y. And a dumb waste of money.

Apparently, state officials heard the outcry.

No one really wanted a $25 million bridge that would have taken pedestrian­s in elevators to a walkway 80 feet in the sky, all so they could cross the New River near the U.S. 1 tunnel in downtown Fort Lauderdale.

The controvers­ial plan, more than two years in the making, was dead as of Wednesday. In the end, too many people were opposed, from residents to business leaders to officials at Fort Lauderdale City Hall.

The bridge would have cost $9 million a year to maintain.

Fort Lauderdale Mayor Dean Trantalis had a hand in talking state transporta­tion officials out of moving forward with the project.

“We had a meeting last week,” he said. “We talked about a lot of things. At the end of the discussion, they agreed that if the community does not support the bridge, we can find other alternativ­es that are less expensive and less intrusive.”

City commission­ers objected to the bridge last June, telling state officials it would be a huge waste of taxpayer money.

Fort Lauderdale resident Ronald Castille referred to the bridge as a

“total monstrosit­y” that would have amounted to “another dumb government­al waste of money by the state and local politician­s.”

Another resident, David Nusbaum, called it the bridge to nowhere.

Heavy hitters from the marine industry also voiced strong opposition to the bridge, pointing out that pedestrian­s have access to bridges at Third Avenue and Andrews Avenue.

Phil Purcell, CEO and president of Marine Industries Associatio­n of South Florida, complained last year that the bridge would hurt the $8.8 billion marine industry.

He urged planners to steer their attention to improving public transit and traffic gridlock.

“Once we get those things solved, then we can turn to cute little projects that hold no real value,” he said at the time.

Florida transporta­tion officials came up with the idea after getting a letter from Broward Schools Superinten­dent Robert Runcie in January 2016. Runcie’s letter said the walkway through the U.S. 1 tunnel was too dangerous for children who live north of the tunnel but go to an elementary school on the south side of it.

By June 2017, state officials had already spent $111,540 on a 186-page feasibilit­y study. Their next step required a more in-depth study that would have cost $1.4 million.

Fort Lauderdale commission­ers say they didn’t get wind of things until June 2018, when the South Florida Sun Sentinel published a story about the state’s grand plans for a bridge over the New River.

The entire commission was “taken off guard” by the news, Trantalis said Thursday.

“The [former] city manager never brought that to us,” he said. “It’s something he kept under his hat. There was no community buy-in.”

Shipyard owner Bob Roscioli said he was happy to hear the project was dead.

“That’s crazy to spend that kind of money,” Roscioli said. “You already have a tunnel to go through. With all the things that need to be done in this town, there’s better ways to spend the money.”

 ?? FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA­TION ILLUSTRATI­ON ?? The Department of Transporta­tion has canceled plans to build an 80-foot-tall pedestrian bridge over the New River in Fort Lauderdale. The bridge would have cost $25 million.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA­TION ILLUSTRATI­ON The Department of Transporta­tion has canceled plans to build an 80-foot-tall pedestrian bridge over the New River in Fort Lauderdale. The bridge would have cost $25 million.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States