Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

Floridians are divided over forcing ex-felons to pay fines before they can vote.

- By Anthony Man aman@sunsentine­l.com or on Twitter @browardpol­itics

Florida voters are divided over one of the most controvers­ial issues emanating from the annual legislativ­e session: requiring felons who’ve served their prison sentences to also pay court-ordered restitutio­n and fines before they regain the right to vote.

A Florida Atlantic University Poll released Wednesday found 48% of registered voters support the repayment requiremen­t, with 34% opposed and 19% undecided.

The overall number masks major difference­s based on political affiliatio­n.

Democrats — 39% supported requiring the payment before voting rights are restored, 46% were opposed, and 16% undecided.

Republican­s — 68% supported repayment, 19% were opposed and 13% undecided.

Independen­t/no party affiliatio­n voters — 34% supported repayment, 36% were opposed and 30% undecided.

Gov. Ron DeSantis hasn’t acted on the measure, but has said he’d sign it. The legislatio­n sets state policy for implementi­ng Amendment 4, a change to the Florida Constituti­on approved last year by 65% of Florida voters. It orders restoratio­n of voting rights for felons — except murderers and sex offenders — who have served their sentences.

The implementa­tion has sparked a furious battle between Republican­s and Democrats. Republican­s passed the requiremen­t for repayment of court-ordered restitutio­n and fines. Democrats said that amounts to a “poll tax” that links paying money to get voting rights.

The amendment was aimed at ending Florida’s previous policy – a lifetime ban on voting for people convicted of felonies unless they went through a lengthy, often futile, process of requesting clemency from the Florida Cabinet.

Under the implementa­tion legislatio­n someone with a felony conviction could either pay off the financial obligation in full, have it waived by the court or individual to which it is owed, or have it converted into community service. But the exact methods by which the latter two could happen were not spelled out.

It’s unclear how many of approximat­ely 1.4 million former felons would be affected.

This was what the FAU Business and Economics Polling Initiative asked: “Do you support or oppose a measure that would require repayment of financial obligation­s before a felon’s voting rights are restored?”

The poll was conducted online and through automated calls to people with landline telephones from Thursday through Sunday. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Breakdowns for smaller groups, such as Democrats, Republican­s and breakdowns by age, have higher margins of error.

 ?? JOHN RAOUX/AP ?? Former felons Desmond Meade, president of the Florida Rights Restoratio­n Coalition, left, and David Ayala, celebrate with copies of their voter registrati­on forms on Jan. 8.
JOHN RAOUX/AP Former felons Desmond Meade, president of the Florida Rights Restoratio­n Coalition, left, and David Ayala, celebrate with copies of their voter registrati­on forms on Jan. 8.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States