Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

US, Taliban take step toward peace

Sides view 7-day cut in violence as a key test in Afghanista­n

- By David E. Sanger and Richard Pérez-Peña

U.S. officials said Friday they had agreed on a sevenday reduction in violence in Afghanista­n.

MUNICH — U.S. officials said Friday that they had agreed with the Taliban on a seven-day reduction in violence in Afghanista­n that, if it holds, would be followed by an Afghan peace agreement after 18 years of war.

The decrease in hostilitie­s would be the first step in a plan leading to withdrawal of American troops from Afghanista­n, though there have been indication­s that the United States would want to keep some counterter­rorism and intelligen­ce forces there.

The agreement on a reduction in violence was announced by a senior administra­tion official at the annual Munich Security Conference, where Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Defense Secretary Mark Esper are defending American policies.

But the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the Taliban would have to adhere to that reduction for seven days before a formal peace pact could be signed. The timing is notable. If the seven-day period begins this weekend or early next week, and it holds for a week, the peace agreement would be ready to sign around the time that President Donald Trump is scheduled to travel to India.

That opens the possibilit­y that the president, who previously attempted to bring members of the Taliban to Camp David for a signing, would have the option of traveling to a secure location, like Bagram Air Base in Afghanista­n, to formalize an agreement.

A truce has been widely expected, and Pompeo and Esper met Friday in Munich with Ashraf Ghani, Afghanista­n’s president.

But there was no announceme­nt of an imminent deal, and similar efforts have fallen apart.

Trump pulled back on an accord last year after an attack that killed an American soldier and 11 others.

The senior official who briefed reporters in Munich said that the agreement would not go into effect until a verified, successful reduction in hostilitie­s, which is far short of a blanket cease-fire.

The violence reduction deal, the official said, is specific, saying that it would have to be nationwide and include violence against Afghans as well as members of the U.S.-led coalition, and would apply to all the elements of violence that have become familiar in 18 years of war: roadside bombs, suicide bombs and rocket attacks.

The pace of an American pullout is the issue of most political importance to Trump.

One of the few issues on which he and the Democratic challenger­s for president agree is the need for the United States to get out of Afghanista­n — though many of the candidates said in a survey published by The New York Times last week that they would keep a small counterter­rorism force and some intelligen­ce presence.

The Trump administra­tion seems likely to do the same. But officials would not discuss any side agreements with the Taliban that might permit such a presence, including by the CIA.

The senior official said any American presence depends on whether the Taliban deliver on their promises.

All sides are keenly aware that history suggests there will be multiple chances for the deal to break down.

But it is the closest they have come to Trump’s goals of withdrawin­g many of the U.S. troops in Afghanista­n and ending the United States’ longest war.

The initial seven-day reduction in violence is seen as a test not only of good intentions, but also of the ability of the Taliban and the Afghan government to rein in their forces and those of their allies, in a war made more complex by internal rivalries and local disputes.

A decline in hostilitie­s would be an abrupt shift, coming off one of the most violent years in the long conflict.

In 2019, the civilian death rate averaged almost seven per day, the United States dropped more than 7,000 bombs and missiles, and the Taliban and smaller armed insurgent groups carried out about 25,000 attacks.

The deal would lay out a 135-day timetable for drawing down American troop strength in Afghanista­n from about 13,000 to 8,600; U.S. officials had indicated that they planned to make the reduction with or without an agreement in place.

The deal calls for a complete American withdrawal within three to five years, though it is not clear what constitute­s “complete withdrawal.”

It also calls for the start of negotiatio­ns between the government in Kabul and the Taliban — something the Taliban has long refused — on a long-term powershari­ng settlement.

Afghan leaders have been frustrated by the United States’ acceding to the Taliban’s demand that negotiatio­ns, held over the past year in Doha, Qatar, exclude the government, even as deadly violence continued.

The initial seven-day reduction in violence is seen as a test not only of good intentions, but also of the ability of the Taliban and the Afghan government to rein in their forces and those of their allies, in a war made more complex by internal rivalries and local disputes.

 ?? JIM HUYLEBROEK/THE NEW YORK TIMES 2019 ?? A U.S. administra­tion official said the seven-day deal would have to end violence against Afghans and the U.S.-led coalition. Above, the aftermath of a car bombing in Kabul.
JIM HUYLEBROEK/THE NEW YORK TIMES 2019 A U.S. administra­tion official said the seven-day deal would have to end violence against Afghans and the U.S.-led coalition. Above, the aftermath of a car bombing in Kabul.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States