Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

Russian accounts active in 2020 race

Social media posts focus on race, gun laws, immigratio­n

- By Amanda Seitz and Barbara Ortutay

A new report shows the same groups that stoked divisions in the 2016 election are sowing discord again.

Four years after Russialink­ed groups stoked divisions in the U.S. presidenti­al election on social media platforms, a new report shows that Moscow’s campaign hasn’t let up and has become harder to detect.

The report from University of Wisconsin-Madison professor Young Mie Kim found that Russialink­ed social media accounts are posting about the same divisive issues — race relations, gun laws and immigratio­n — as they did in 2016, when the Kremlin polluted American voters’ feeds with messages about the presidenti­al election. Facebook has since removed the accounts.

Since then, however, the Russians have grown better at imitating U.S. campaigns and political fan pages online, said Kim, who analyzed thousands of posts. She studied more than 5 million Facebook ads during the 2016 election, identifyin­g Russia’s fingerprin­ts on some of the messages through an ad-tracking app.

Her review is copublishe­d by the Brennan Center for Justice, a law and policy institute, where she is a scholar.

The Russian improvemen­ts make it harder for voters and social media platforms to identify the foreign interferen­ce, Kim said.

“For normal users, it is too subtle to discern the difference­s,” Kim said. “By mimicking domestic actors, with similar logos (and) similar names, they are trying to avoid verificati­on.”

Kim’s report comes weeks after U.S. intelligen­ce officials briefed lawmakers on Russian efforts to stir chaos in American politics and undermine public confidence in this year’s election. The classified briefing detailed Russian efforts to boost the White House bids of both Republican President Donald Trump and Democratic Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Last month, FBI Director Christophe­r Wray warned that Russia was still waging “informatio­n warfare” with an army of fictional social media personas and bots that spread disinforma­tion.

In a rare, joint statement last week, the leaders of America’s intelligen­ce agencies cautioned that foreign actors were spreading false informatio­n ahead of Super Tuesday to “cause confusion and create doubt in our system.”

But intelligen­ce officials have not released any details about the type of disinforma­tion or explained how Americans should protect themselves from it.

Russia has repeatedly denied interferin­g in the U.S. elections, and did again on Thursday.

“You just want us to repeat again that we have nothing to do with the U.S. elections,” Russia’s foreign ministry spokeswoma­n Maria Zakharova said.

Russia has refined its techniques since 2016 and new foreign actors have joined the game, making it harder to identify Kremlinbac­ked disinforma­tion said Thomas Rid, a national security expert who has written a book about the Kremlin’s history of spreading disinforma­tion.

“I do pick up some chatter that the visibility into Russian operations is not as good as it may appear,” Rid said. “It’s very difficult to spot Russian interferen­ce today.”

Still, it’s unclear how much effect — if any — Russian disinforma­tion tactics have had on voters. Some of Russia’s social media ads in the 2016 U.S. presidenti­al election were seen by only a handful of people and their effect has been “vastly overstated,” Rid said.

But Kim’s report pulls back the curtain on some of the online techniques Russia has already used in this year’s presidenti­al race, including targeting battlegrou­nd states with its divisive messaging.

Her review identified thousands of posts last year from more than 30 Instagram accounts, which Facebook removed from the site in October after concluding that they originated from Russia and had links to the Internet Research Agency, a Russian operation that targeted U.S. audiences in 2016. Facebook owns Instagram.

Analysis from Graphika, a disinforma­tion security firm, also concluded at the time that the accounts went to “great lengths to hide their origins.”

“We will keep evolving our defenses and announcing these influence campaigns, as we did more than 50 times last year,” Facebook

said in an email.

After getting caught offguard with Russia’s 2016 election interferen­ce attempts, Facebook, Google, Twitter and others put safeguards in place to prevent it from happening again. This includes taking down posts, groups and accounts that engage in “coordinate­d inauthenti­c behavior,” and strengthen­ing verificati­on procedures for political ads.

Kim’s analysis found the accounts appeared to mimic existing political ones, including one called “Bernie.2020—” that used campaign logos to make it seem like it was connected to Sanders’ campaign or was a fan page for his supporters, Kim said.

Some candidates also were targeted directly.

An account called Stop.Trump2020 posted anti-Trump content. Other Instagram accounts pushed negative messages about Democrat Joe Biden.

“Like for Trump 2020,” said one meme featuring a portrait photo of Trump and a photo of Biden. “Ignore for Biden 2020.”

It was posted by an Instagram account called Iowa.Patriot, one of several accounts that targeted specific communitie­s in crucial swing states like Michigan, Ohio and Iowa with messaging.

The accounts also appeared to capitalize on other divisive American issues that emerged after the 2016 election.

The accounts varied in how often they posted, the size of their following and the traction the posts received. But they carried the hallmarks of a Russianbac­ked online disinforma­tion campaign, Kim said.

“They’re clearly adapting to current affairs,” Kim said. “Targeting both sides with messages is very unique to Russia.”

 ?? JON ELSWICK/AP ?? Instagram posts were pulled off the site in October after it was concluded they originated from Russia.
JON ELSWICK/AP Instagram posts were pulled off the site in October after it was concluded they originated from Russia.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States