Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

There’s no hiding the partisan split

Dems more likely to wear face masks than Republican­s

- By David A. Lieb

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — To the issues creating a partisan divide in state legislatur­es across the U.S., add this one: masks.

Many Democratic lawmakers are wearing them amid the coronaviru­s outbreak while many Republican­s refuse.

“Public health has become partisan,” bemoaned South Carolina state Rep. Kambrell Garvin, a Democrat who recently became ill from COVID-19.

As legislatur­es around the country resume work following coronaviru­s suspension­s, Democrats and Republican­s also have split over social distancing, remote voting and the extension of emergency powers for governors who had ordered businesses to close and residents to remain home.

Lawmakers have become ill from the coronaviru­s in nearly half the states, with Democrats accounting for about two-thirds of the 40 confirmed COVID-19 cases, according to an Associated Press tally. Three lawmakers died of the virus — a Michigan Democrat in late March and Republican­s in Louisiana and South Dakota in early April.

Partisan divisions appear to have grown since then, particular­ly in the South and Midwest, as some Republican­s pushed to reopen the economy faster than some Democrats.

While there have been bipartisan exceptions, mask-wearing divisions among Democrats and Republican­s have been evident during recent legislativ­e sessions in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississipp­i, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvan­ia, South

Carolina and Tennessee.

In Illinois, Republican Rep. Darren Bailey was removed from a convention center functionin­g as the House floor last month for refusing to wear a mask. His ejection came just moments after the Democratic-led chamber approved a mask mandate with support from some Republican­s in a move Bailey considered “a show.”

“The mask is not about health. It’s about more bureaucrac­y and more government control, of which the liberal Democrat thrives on,” Bailey said.

When Pennsylvan­ia Republican Rep. Andrew Lewis announced through a news release that he had self-isolated and recovered from COVID-19, Democratic colleagues expressed outrage that his diagnosis had been kept secret from them for a week. Democrats demanded changes requiring lawmakers to wear masks in the Republican­controlled

legislatur­e, but GOP legislativ­e leaders have not acted on the request.

In Ohio, a Democratic proposal to require masks at House sessions and committee meetings was defeated on a party-line vote last month in the Republican-led chamber. A Republican lawmaker then filed legislatio­n to bar mask requiremen­ts statewide unless approved by two-thirds of lawmakers. The measure is pending.

Some trace the partisan divergence on coronaviru­s precaution­s to the very top of American politics. Republican President Donald Trump hasn’t publicly worn masks, not even while announcing federal recommenda­tions that Americans wear face coverings in public to help fight the spread of the virus.

“I think that when our president ... signals that masks aren’t politicall­y expedient, then I think that trickles down to the local and state level,” said Garvin, the South Carolina Democrat who has worn masks both before and after his coronaviru­s illness.

Several recent studies using polling and smartphone GPS data have shown that Democrats are more apt than Republican­s to embrace social distancing in public, wear masks and stay at home because of the coronaviru­s.

Virus precaution­s have started to become an ideologica­l means of group identifica­tion, similar to partisan divisions over abortion or other hot-button issues, said psychology professor Hank Rothgerber of Bellarmine University in Louisville, Kentucky.

“Democrats now have identified themselves as the party that’s taking this more seriously and is more concerned about public health,” Rothgerber said, “and Republican­s

are identifyin­g themselves as a party that is focused on opening the economy back up and not overreacti­ng to this crisis.”

When the Missouri House met in April to pass a coronaviru­s budget bill, Republican leadership imposed strict social distancing. Lawmakers listened to proceeding­s over the internet in offices until summoned to the chamber in small groups to vote. Nearly everyone wore masks.

Yet those precaution­s were abandoned as the House finished its session in May. Lawmakers sat packed together at desks and few Republican­s wore masks, though numerous Democrats still did.

Democratic Rep. Joe Runions, who had been out for weeks with COVID-19, was aghast at what he described as “inconsider­ate and selfish” behavior.

“To me, leadership starts with, you put that mask on.

I don’t care who you are — the president, the governor, the pope, whoever,” Runions said.

Republican House Speaker Elijah Haahr noted that lawmakers’ temperatur­es were checked as they entered the Capitol.

Health screenings also were required of legislativ­e staff and media at the Alaska Capitol, although lawmakers could skip it. Protocols said masks were required. But Republican state Sen. Lora Reinbold didn’t wear one.

“It didn’t make sense to me,” Reinbold said. “I saw no research on cloth, silk, cotton face coverings that they prevent COVID.”

The coronaviru­s can be spread through respirator­y droplets when people cough, sneeze or talk. The CDC says cloth masks can help prevent people, who may not realize they are infected, from spreading the virus to others.

 ?? TED SCHURTER/THE STATE JOURNAL-REGISTER ?? The Illinois House voted 81-27 in May to remove Republican state Rep. Darren Bailey, left, from the House floor for not wearing a mask.
TED SCHURTER/THE STATE JOURNAL-REGISTER The Illinois House voted 81-27 in May to remove Republican state Rep. Darren Bailey, left, from the House floor for not wearing a mask.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States